Laserfiche WebLink
MAYOR <br />Michael L Fahey <br />COUNCIL <br />Beverly Scalze <br />Jim LaValle <br />Matt Anderson <br />Rick Montour <br />515 Little Canada Road, Little Canada, MN 55117 -1600 ADMINISTRATOR <br />(651) 766 -4029 / FAX: (651) 766 -4048 Joel R. Hanson <br />Email: cityhall @ci.little- canada.mn.us <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Mayor Fahey & Members of the City Council <br />FROM: Joel Hanson, City Administrator <br />DATE: December 27, 2000 <br />RE: Frattalone Development Concept <br />At our November Council Meeting, I was asked to provide some comparative tax calculations <br />for various development types that could occur on Mr. Frattalone's land located on the south end <br />of Blacktem Pond (see attached). You will note the range of values is from approximately 320 <br />to $40 per square foot. The exception to this range is the Heritage Office Park Development on <br />County Road D where the value approaches 375 per square foot. The concern in using these <br />numbers in this analysis relates to the ability to develop that type of project on this site. <br />The next sheet is a comparison between a 100,000 square foot building and the concept proposed <br />by Mr. Frattalone. I used 330 per square foot for the office /warehouse building, as that seems to <br />be the midpoint for the possible types of buildings. (That amount could be higher depending on <br />the ratio of office to warehouse space to be constructed.) For the Frattalone concept, I used 370 <br />per square foot for the office (CI Title Building is $60 while the County has told me other offices <br />can be valued around 380.). $22.50 was used as the cost per square foot for the shop. (I related <br />it to the industrial buildings in the area.). <br />The results of this analysis indicate that a 100,000 office /warehouse building would generate <br />substantially more taxes than the Frattalone concept. However, is that realistic to expect for this <br />site? <br />I called John Peterson, both of Colliers /Towle Real Estate to get his opinion. John Peterson <br />indicated that the site has the greatest marketability for use by a contractor or trucking company <br />as long as outdoor storage is allowed. He estimates the property value at 33.00 per square foot <br />for this type of use. Peterson did not see the property as an ideal office /warehouse site. Given <br />the size of the property, he indicated that an 80,000 to 100,000 square foot office /warehouse <br />facility would need to be constructed, and he did not think the market would support that. He <br />thought rather than one large building; it would be more likely that two to three office /warehouse <br />Page 10 <br />