01-03-2001 Council Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 24, 1997 Fahey asked the type of user that Frattalone anticipated for the site. Frattalone replied that one user he has had discussions with packaged plastic products. This user was looking for 30% office space, and the rest warehouse. Frattalone indicated that he has had discussions with two users both of whom wanted development to begin immediately. Given the site work that is necessary, this was not possible. Frattalone also pointed out that the I -P District requires 30% of the site to remain green area. Scalze felt that once the site was graded, a certain type of development could be locked in. Frattalone indicated that it would be difficult to market the site the way it is. Scalze stated that she did not have a problem with an I -P use, but felt that 30% office space and the rest warehouse was not a good use of the property. Frattalone indicated that he was open to a PUD with restrictions limiting the percentage of warehouse space. Fahey suggested that the property be rezoned to PUD. Fahey pointed out that the site must be graded in order to be made developable. Fahey aiso pointed out that the building developed on the site would have to meet a certain mix of office and warehouse. Frattalone would be taking a risk as to what that percentage of mix would be. Frattalone felt that was acceptable as long as the building would not be limited to totally office. Frattalone suggested that the property could either be rezoned to PUD with an I -P underlying district and the amount of warehouse limited, or the property could be rezoned to I -P with those same restrictions. The City Planner suggested that the more upfront approach would be to rezone the property to PUD with a conditional use permit for an office /warehouse development. Morelan pointed out that the Council had this discussion previously, and asked if the Council's thoughts had been passed on to the Water Department. Page 33