Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />Cicy Council <br />May 22, 1985 <br />Zoch Mrs. ScaLce commented that the Zoch's were given assurances chat they <br />Rezoning could have the same zoning as the Nadeau property and the Rudy property <br />(Cont.) across the street. <br />Mr. Lee felt that it was impractical to look at the west side of the <br />street as possible retail, as Listed in the uses for RB property. <br />Mr. Slesener felt that the property should. be R -1. or B -3. Scalze <br />pointed out the, B -3 zoning across the street. <br />Mr. Lee stated that B -3 zoning for the Loch property would cause no <br />more impact in the area. <br />Mr.. Fahey pointed out that the Planning Commission has recommended <br />B -3 zoning for the Zoch property. <br />Mrs. Scalze introduced che following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 85 -5 -244 — APPROVING THE REZONING <br />OF THE REMAINDER OF THE ZOCH PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH <br />OF THE 90 FEET OF RESIDENTIALLY ZONED PROPERTY FROM <br />R —L TO B -3 AND WITH THE REQUIREMENT-OF AN 8.5 FOOT <br />RIGHT —OF —WAY EASEMENT ALONG CONDUIT <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Blesener.. <br />Ayes (5) Scalze, Blesener, Nardini, Collova, Fahey. <br />Nayes (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution 3ook No. 12, Page 246. <br />Mr. Fahey introduced che Following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />/ RESOLUTION NO. 85 -5 -245 — INSTRUCTING THE CITY <br />v ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN ORDINANCE: ADOPTING THE. <br />REZONING OF THE ZOCH PROPERTY. <br />The Foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr.. Collova.. <br />Ayes (5). Fahey, Collova, Nardini, Scalze,: Blesener.. <br />Mayes (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This resoltuion appears in Resolution Book No.. 12, Page 247.. <br />Mr. Rudy reported that there currently is some problem with the existing <br />auto body in the area. Mr. Rudy suggested that the City discuss this <br />with the business owner. <br />Page 110 <br />