My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-26-2001 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
09-26-2001 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2012 1:56:13 PM
Creation date
6/25/2012 1:42:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the zoning to another district would remove a significant portion of land from <br />the limited supply of commercial /industrial opportunities. Moreover, this <br />particular site is arguably of high value, due to its proximity to the Rice <br />Street/694 interchange and its high visibility to the freeway. The City should <br />carefully consider whether the loss of this site from its commercial /industrial <br />inventory would be supported by the Comprehensive Plan. <br />2. The applicant shall demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the <br />proposed site is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. <br />The applicant suggests that the church use will be compatible with the <br />surrounding land uses. To the east is the Levitz furniture warehouse (zoned <br />Business Warehouse), and to the west are a series of industrial buildings <br />(zoned Industrial Park). The church would have its peak usage times on <br />Sunday mornings, with scattered use throughout the week, mostly during the <br />evenings. The applicants have stated that the activities of the church would <br />not interfere with or bother any of the surrounding land uses. <br />3. The applicant shall demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the <br />proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein. <br />The church will occupy existing buildings, removing a few of the buildings that <br />are structurally inappropriate or visually unsightly. Remodeling for the church <br />uses would entail interior changes. As a result, the applicant suggests that <br />they would not be affecting performance standards (such as setbacks, etc.) <br />that have not already been approved for the previous occupant. With regard <br />to parking, the zoning ordinance requires one space per three seats in the <br />main assembly area, plus parking supply for other concurrent uses on the <br />property. The applicants suggest that over the next several years, <br />attendance at their peak service times would be 576, requiring 192 parking <br />spaces, plus spaces to accommodate other activities, including office or <br />church school uses. The current parking area contains 234 spaces. At least <br />some of the parking area would require new curb and gutter. Depending on <br />the level of activity occurring during services, the parking supply appears to <br />conform to the ordinance requirements. <br />4. The applicant shall demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the <br />proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the aggregate property values <br />in the are in which the amendment is proposed. <br />The applicant has not submitted direct information regarding property value <br />impact, such as tax information or property appraisal opinions. The materials <br />suggest that the facility will not have any negative impact due to a lower level <br />of intensity of use, and site development (such as green space) that will <br />Page 42 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.