My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-26-2000 Additions
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
01-26-2000 Additions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/27/2012 1:01:27 PM
Creation date
6/27/2012 1:00:13 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />OCTOBER 28, 1992 <br />Blesener pointed out that the proposed ordinance limits <br />accessory auto sales to no more than three, and asked <br />if this was in conflict with the limitation in the B -2 <br />District. <br />The Planner reported that his interpretation would be <br />that there are three auto sales licenses allowed in the <br />B -2 District and another three allowed under this <br />proposed ordinance for a total of six. <br />Blesener felt that the two ordinances would be in <br />conflict and subject to interpretation as to the number <br />of licenses that would be allowed. Some might <br />interpret a total of three retail auto sales licenses, <br />while others might interpret six. <br />Council discussed at length the total number of retail <br />auto sales licenses that should be allowed in the City, <br />and it was the consensus of the Council to allow a <br />total of four licenses, with a maximum of two allowed <br />in the B -2 District at any given time. <br />Mrs. Scalze introduced the following resolution and <br />moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 92 -10 -382 - INSTRUCTING THE CITY PLANNER <br />TO REDRAFT AND RESUBMIT TO THE COUNCIL THE PROPOSED <br />AUTO SALES ORDINANCE TO CLEARLY DEFINE A MAXIMUM OF <br />FOUR RETAIL AUTO SALES LICENSES IN THE CITY, WITH NO <br />MORE THAN TWO OF THESE LICENSES ALLOWED IN THE BUSINESS <br />DISTRICT AT ANY GIVEN TIME <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Collova. <br />Ayes (5) Scalze, Collova, Hanson, LaValle, Blesener. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />WETLAND The Planner reported that the State is considering <br />REGULATIONS adoption of no net loss wetland regulation. The <br />Planner reported that he would provide the Council with <br />further information on these regulations as it becomes <br />available. <br />SHORELAND The City Administrator recommended approval of a <br />GRANT Shoreland Grant Agreement, which would involve a 50% <br />AGREEMENT matching grant up to a maximum of $5,000 to be used <br />toward the City's costs in updating its shoreland <br />regulations. <br />Mr. Blesener introduced the following resolution and <br />moved its adoption: <br />Page 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.