Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />SEPTEMBER 10, 1992 <br />District, it would have a hard time saying no to all <br />these requests if requirements are met. <br />Drabik pointed out that the City already has three <br />licenses, and suggested that the maximum be set at <br />three since the City does not have the ability to <br />enforce any more than that. <br />The City Planner felt that would be a legitimate <br />approach. New licenses could be issued as existing <br />ones become inactive and lapse. <br />Herkenhoff suggested limiting the number of cars for <br />sale. <br />The Planner felt that would be difficult since a <br />property owner could claim that one car is for sale and <br />another is not. The Planner again pointed out the <br />limitation on number of cars in the B -3 District based <br />on amount of square footage. The Planner noted that a <br />CUP runs with the land. <br />Drabik felt that it would be necessary to judge each <br />application on existing conditions. <br />Garske stated that it was his opinion that retail auto <br />sales in the Industrial District should be either very <br />much limited or eliminated. <br />The City Planner suggested that he prepare some draft <br />ordinance options addressing the issue. The Commission <br />can review these and then propose an ordinance to the <br />City Council. It was suggested that the Planner put <br />together some examples of how other cities address the <br />issue as well. <br />Drabik stated that she would like to see retail auto <br />sales licenses in Industrial limited to three. <br />Keis agreed, but felt it unfair to blind -side the <br />Industrial District property owners with this <br />limitation. <br />Herkenhoff instructed the City Planner to put together <br />some ordinance proposals addressing the issue of auto <br />sales for review by the Planning Commission at its next <br />meeting, as well as a report on how other cities <br />address the issue of retail auto sales in the <br />Industrial District. <br />Motion seconded by Garske. <br />Motion carried 6 - 0. <br />Page 16 <br />