Laserfiche WebLink
MAYOR <br />Michael I. Fahey <br />COUNCIL <br />Beverly Scalze <br />Jim LaValle <br />Steve Morelan <br />Bob Pedersen <br />515 Little Canada Road, Little Canada, MN 55117 -1600 ADMINISTRATOR <br />(651) 484 -2177 / FAX: (651) 484 -4538 Joel R. Hanson <br />Email: cityhall @ci.little - canada.mn.us <br />DATE: December 29, 1999 <br />TO: Mayor Fahey & Members of the City Council <br />FROM: Julie Manville -Camp, Accountant <br />RE: Provinces Payment in Lieu of Taxes <br />As you may recall, the City approved the issuance of tax exempt mortgage revenue bonds to finance the acquisition <br />and renovation of the Provinces and Montreal Courts apartment complexes in 1996 and 1997 respectively. In doing <br />so, we established provisions to generate payments in lieu of taxes should they pursue 4(d) class rate designations. <br />(This was done to protect the City's property tax base.) These provisions remain in effect throughout the term of the <br />bond issues. <br />In 1999 the provisions came into play, and a payment was received from Montreal Courts in the amount of $25,871, <br />on which the Council took action in November. We have now received a payment from the Provinces in the amount of <br />$6,156 which will require like action. The issue for the Council to consider is where to post this money now and how <br />it should be handled in future budgets. <br />As with the Montreal Courts monies, the options are as follows: <br />♦ Place it in the General Fund. In 1999, this would generate additional surpluses that would then transfer to <br />the General Capital Improvement Fund. (It could specifically help with the additional costs of lighting <br />Pioneer Park.) In future years, it could help offset expenses thereby holding the line on tax increases. <br />• Place it in the General Capital Improvement Fund. As was discussed at a recent meeting, needs outweigh <br />revenues. This would help alleviate that problem. It would also avoid creating a dependency situation <br />that would arise if it were placed in the General Fund. <br />♦ Place it in the Infrastructure Replacement Fund. This is pretty much the same analysis as the previous <br />option. The difference is the importance placed on the need for funding. <br />♦ Place it in a fund for economic development. Assuming the Rice Street/Little Canada Road project <br />moves forward at some point, dollars will definitely be needed in this area beyond what TIF and land <br />sales will generate. <br />The Montreal Courts monies were placed in the General Capital Improvement Fund at your direction, and I would <br />recommend the same designation for the Provinces funds as the needs in this area often exceed the available funds. <br />You may also be interested to know that the Provinces Sprinkler Escrow Account has been established and the first <br />deposits were credited last week. The City contributed $38,850 from our Economic Development fund as per the <br />agreement, and the Provinces contributed $17,921 per the attached calculation. <br />Page 221 <br />