Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JULY 25, 2012 <br />THAT TCF ENTER INTO A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH <br />THE CITY <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by McGraw. <br />Ayes (5). <br />Nays (0). <br />VARIANCES — Blesener opened the continued Public Hearing to consider the application <br />3246 TWIN of Tim Mercil, 3246 Twin Lake Road, for a Variance to allow <br />LAKE ROAD — construction of a detached garage in a front yard and a Variance from the <br />MERCIL front yard setback requirements. It was noted that the Planning <br />Commission had a tie vote on this matter and forwarded it on to the <br />Council without a recommendation. <br />The City Planner reported that the applicant is proposing to construct a <br />detached garage to replace an existing dilapidated garage on the property. <br />The new garage is proposed to be located to the south of the existing <br />house and would utilize unimproved Mitchell Trail for access. The <br />current garage is on the north of the property and utilizes a shared <br />driveway that exists via private easement. The Planner noted that when <br />this matter was discussed at Planning Commission, it was found that while <br />the applicant would remove the old garage, he wanted to maintain the <br />access on the north in addition to the new access to the south. <br />The Planner reported that since the last meeting, the applicant met with <br />planning staff and developed a new site plan. The new plan turns the <br />garage so that the doors face west. The new orientation allows for a <br />sidewalk area to access the front door of the house on the north side. The <br />Planner felt this was a reasonable change and provided better access to the <br />front of the home. He noted that this is a unique lot given the definition of <br />front yard in the Code causes the front yard to be at the back of the house <br />and the front door faces the rear of the property. The new orientation of <br />the garage results in the garage being only 6 feet off the street easement <br />along the south property line. Again the Planner indicated that given the <br />uniqueness of the property, the use proposed is reasonable and there are <br />practical difficulties in putting the property to a reasonable use. The <br />Planner recommended approval of the alternate plan — Option B. He <br />indicated that if the Council agrees, that approval should be subject to the <br />conditions outlined in his report as well as the additional condition that the <br />existing garage and north access be removed within 30 days of completion <br />of the new garage. <br />Tim Mercil, 3246 Twin Lake Road, applicant, presented a detailed <br />timeline from when he found and purchased this property through July <br />23`d, 2012 when he met with the City Planner to again discuss garage <br />3 <br />