Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />JULY 8, 1999 <br />that he planned to pave on the east side of the building out to a <br />distance of 37 feet, and did not feel the paving should extend out <br />any further than that. <br />The Zoning Administrator pointed out that the Code requires <br />paving with asphalt, blacktop, or concrete of required parking <br />areas, while open and outdoor storage areas can be surfaced with <br />Class 5 or recycled asphalt. <br />Montour pointed out the site plan submitted for this property in <br />1980 shows a parking and drive area located on the east side of the <br />building. Therefore, it must have been thought that the soils were <br />adequate enough to support blacktop. <br />Fischer indicated that he has put thousands of tons of crushed rock <br />into the site and it keeps sinking. <br />Keis indicated that his preference is that required parking areas be <br />blacktopped. Keis asked if there is peat and muck 12 feet down if <br />that was adequate to support blacktop. <br />The City Planner indicated that he would rely on the <br />recommendation of the Public Works Director, and felt that the <br />applicant has not shown that a hardship exists to warrant varying <br />from the Code requirement. <br />Keis indicated that unless the applicant submits a report from an <br />engineer indicating that soil testing was done and the site would <br />not support blacktop, he would not be willing to vary from the <br />Code. <br />The Public Works Director noted that there is no soil information <br />for the area south of the building. Therefore, he could not <br />comment on whether or not the soils would support blacktop. <br />However, he felt that digging out a depth of 10 inches and <br />installing fabric material with the installation of sand and Class 5, <br />as he recommended in his July 8`1, memo, would support blacktop. <br />The Director indicated that the question is the degree of hardship <br />that the Commission wants to consider. <br />Fischer felt the Director's recommendation would be very <br />expensive and estimated the cost at $45,000. Fischer reported that <br />given his recent expenses with hazardous waste removal at an <br />adjoining property, he could not afford this cost. Fischer suggested <br />that he have Twin City Testing do some additional borings to <br />Page 51 <br />