My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-27-1999 Additions
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
04-27-1999 Additions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2012 11:46:47 AM
Creation date
8/29/2012 11:46:15 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Joel Hanson <br />City of Little Canada <br />Site Selection Criteria for Office Development <br />Office Properties are typically segmented into the following classes: <br />April 26, 1999 <br />Page 3 <br />Class A — investment -grade buildings, generally the most desirable in their markets, offering an <br />excellent location and first -rate design, building systems, amenities and management. Class A <br />buildings command the market's highest rents. <br />Class B — Buildings with good locations, management and construction and little functional ob- <br />solescence or deterioration. Class B space is found generally in well - located buildings of an ear- <br />lier generation that have been maintained to a high standard. They may also be new properties <br />located in suburban locations, but without the design and finishing detail of Class A properties. <br />Class C — Buildings that are substantially older than Class A and B buildings and that have not <br />been modernized. Class C buildings are often functionally obsolete. <br />The following are some of the criteria used to select an appropriate office site: <br />I) Excellent access <br />2) Medium to high visibility <br />3) Higher amenity sites with the potential for extensive landscaping <br />4) Close proximity to their workforce and sufficient parking <br />5) Close proximity to a concentration of office buildings or location within an industrial or <br />business park <br />Office users seeking space typically use the above criteria when looking for a suitable location. <br />Office users looking for suburban locations typically place more emphasis on amenities of the <br />building and the surrounding area (being in close proximity to restaurants and /or shopping). <br />Floorplate size and flexibility of the space are also important criteria. <br />The sites near the subject property are currently occupied by office /warehouse buildings. These <br />existing uses however, do not constitute a designated office or business park. While office de- <br />velopment is again on the upswing in the Twin Cities, sites under construction are those in high <br />amenity locations (near to the airport, concentrations of other office properties, in business parks <br />or near major entertainment /shopping areas). There is very little development of office space for <br />small users since existing buildings in most markets have sufficient space to accommodate the <br />demand from these users. <br />Office /warehouse and office /showroom space is currently being developed in many suburban lo- <br />cations throughout the Twin Cities and is in highest demand. Both office /warehouse and office <br />Page 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.