Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Joel Hanson <br />February 19, 1999 <br />Page Two <br />cold -in -place recycling. County data would indicate that the life expectancy for a cold -in- <br />place recycling project would be on the order of 12 to 15 years, dependant upon the amount <br />and kind of traffic. If, at the end of this period, the road is deemed to need total <br />reconstruction, it will not be possible to save the concrete curb and gutter. In a total <br />reconstruction project, the life expectancy of the road is deemed to be 20 years and beyond, <br />however, at the end of that 20 year period, any additional work would not involve total <br />reconstruction but rather a refurbishing of the bituminous surfacing thus allowing the <br />concrete curb and gutter to remain in place. Therefore in a total reconstruction, the life <br />expectancy of the concrete curb and gutter could be estimated at 40 years and beyond. <br />• The next issue we would raise for consideration is really a side issue to this project. These <br />County turnbacks will be placed on the City's Municipal State Aid system (MSA). If the <br />projects are just recycled by the County and left in that fashion they would go onto the City's <br />MSA system as needing total reconstruction at some point in the future. Annually, this <br />classification would generate the most MSA construction funds for the City. If, however, the <br />new concrete curb and gutter is placed along these roads, we believe the Office of State Aid <br />would classify these roads as being reconstructed and meeting State Aid design criteria. <br />The "needs" for the road would be substantially reduced in this category thus lower the <br />amount of MSA construction funds that the City receives for them annually. This presents a <br />double -edged problem. First, if the curb and gutter is placed along the recycled project and <br />the life expectance is approximately 15 years at which time full reconstruction is needed and <br />the Office of State Aid deems that initially they are reconstructed thus lowering the needs, <br />the result would be that in 15 years when the City goes to reconstruct them they will have <br />received no MSA construction funds to help pay for this reconstruction. <br />• We have discussed the option of not installing the concrete curb and gutter with Mr. Brad <br />Linderman of Barr Engineering, the engineer for the watershed. It is our understanding that <br />if concrete curb and gutter is not installed the County will install bituminous curb and gutter <br />where possible. Brad has indicated that his storm drainage design along County Road B2 <br />will function adequately with either type of curbing. <br />• The last point would be the pros and cons of concrete curb and gutter verses bituminous <br />curbing. Obviously the concrete curb and gutter will be much more durable whereas the <br />bituminous curb and gutter can be harmed or often times virtually destroyed by snowplowing <br />operations. From a drainage standpoint either one of the two types of curbing will provide <br />adequate drainage along the edge of the street. I believe that either type of curb will protect <br />the edge of the roadway from rapid deterioration. Aestheticly, the concrete curb and gutter <br />probably provides a more finished look and a better long lasting appearance. Maintenance <br />costs would likely be slightly higher over the life of the road with bituminous curbing. <br />Howard ° r'r n f^moany <br />CO Page 11 <br />