Laserfiche WebLink
Council of why this concept warranted further consideration given our planning efforts to <br />date. <br />*The commissioners' hearing for the Guerin property eminent domain process will be <br />held on March 2 °a. We will be represented by the City Attomey. <br />Northeast Corner of Rice Street/Little Canada Road <br />I have been asked to put together some options to consider in seeking development for <br />this site. While I have not yet discussed this with Rusty Fifield due to his recent <br />vacation, here is my analysis of this situation. The first issue we need to consider is what <br />we want for that corner. Given the principles outlined in the development guide , we <br />should be seeking at least a two -story structure that is located adjacent to the <br />intersection's right -of -way. This would likely need to be an office or office /retail use. <br />Given our costs into that site and depending on the degree of incentive we would need to <br />offer a developer to entice him to build there, we likely need a structure of at least 25,000 <br />square feet that generates an estimated market value of $80 per square foot. This should <br />allow us sufficient tax increment to recover our costs (depending on the final outcome of <br />the Guerin eminent domain proceedings). <br />To attract a developer to this site, I think there are three basic approaches: <br />The first would be to do an RFP on the site outlining development parameters we <br />need attained. The pros of this approach would be dealing directly with the <br />developer thereby lowering costs associated with putting a deal together and a <br />better opportunity to screen out desired projects through the RFP process. The <br />cons of this approach involve the uncertainty in attracting a developer (see our <br />last RFP process for this area) and development interest in this site given the <br />appearance of surrounding properties. <br />2. We could list the property with a realtor/broker and have them aggressively <br />market the site. The pros of this approach include a targeted marketing program <br />with better industry contacts. The cons include higher costs associated with a <br />broker's commission and the appearance of surrounding properties. <br />3. The third approach would be to place our own real estate sign on the corner and <br />take a wait and see attitude with the other concepts being proposed for the <br />southeast site. The key benefit of this approach is that as other redevelopment <br />occurs on the southeast corner, this site becomes more valuable and should be <br />easier to attract development. The principle detraction with this approach is more <br />time could be wasted if nothing happens on the southeast corner. <br />Council discussion is necessary to set a direction as to how to approach the development <br />of this property. <br />Page 21 <br />