My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-27-1999 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
01-27-1999 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2012 3:02:21 PM
Creation date
8/29/2012 3:00:01 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CIS <br />Castle Inspection Service <br />A Division of Castle Companies Inc. 2440 Linwood Court <br />Maplewood, MN 55119 <br />MEMORANDUM <br />To: Joel Hanson, City Administrator <br />FROM: Greg Schmit, Building Official <br />DATE: November 18, 1998 <br />SUBJECT: Clarification of cantilevers into the setback area <br />First, a little history. This issue came to light when I received a permit application for a new home to be built on <br />Schletty drive. Upon initial review, I noticed that the cantilevered portion of the structure extended 2 feet into the <br />required 30 foot rear yard setback. My initial reaction was that this would indeed be an encroachment and would not <br />be allowed. In checking the Little Canada Zoning Ordinance to verify this, I discovered that the ordinance section <br />902.010, 143, defines the setback as being "measured from the most outwardly extended portion of the structure at <br />ground level ". After discussing the issue with Steve Grittman, we concurred that with this definition in the ordinance, <br />the proposed building would be allowed. That, plus the discussions at the planning commission, gets us to where we <br />are today. <br />If we continue along the path of allowing cantilevered encroachments, we begin to raise other questions such as; how <br />many floors with 2 foot cantilevers are allowed above the "main" floor, what is the definition of the main floor, what <br />about the required side or front yards, how about commercial uses? Unless it is your desire to change or reduce the <br />required setback distances, I would not recommend this course of action. <br />In my experience, and as I currently enforce these issues for other municipalities, a cantilevered portion of the building <br />is just that...a portion of the building. The setbacks are therefore measured from the lot lines to most outwardly portion <br />of the building. Allowable encroachments are as stated in Ordinance section 903.030.C, such as stoops, decks, <br />chimneys, eaves, etc. <br />The solution, as I see it, is to simply delete the second sentence from the definition of setbacks. This would leave us to <br />measure setbacks as the horizontal distance between the property lines etc. and the building ... no matter what the <br />vertical elevation is. <br />A wall that encloses floor area should define the building whether it is built directly on top of the foundation, <br />cantilevered past it, or set in from the foundation. <br />Phone: 651- 731 -7881 Fax: 651-702-9364 <br />Page 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.