Laserfiche WebLink
With the proximity of the ponding and wetland areas to the residential units, it would be <br />helpful to have a proposed landscape plan which shows how these areas will be finished <br />out. Many developments such as this one include patio spaces and other outdoor <br />amenities which will need to be accommodated in the shallow rear yard area. With the <br />necessary slope, it is unclear from the plans how the rear yard portions of units 23 through <br />29 will work. A landscaping plan illustrating this detail, as well as the screening from the <br />north, should be submitted for City review prior to final approval. <br />Another landscaping issue is within the pond areas. These areas will be dry at times and <br />wet at others, depending on rainfall amounts and the rate of flow. Under this condition, <br />ponding areas can become eyesores since they are neither wet enough to maintain a <br />wetland vegetation, nor dry enough to sustain most ornamental plant materials. There are <br />planting schemes which can better tolerate these conditions, and the developer's <br />landscape plan should incorporate a planting plan which addresses the aesthetics of the <br />ponding. <br />Apart from the grading and landscaping detail, the plans vary slight from previous <br />concepts. The earlier concept plans for the north part of the project included two small cul- <br />de -sac bubbles across from Pitrina Way and David Circle. These cul -de -sacs helped to <br />vary the streetscape along Allan Avenue. The current plan proposal maintains a <br />continuous line of buildings which vary at the front building line only slightly. <br />The density of this phase is lower than the maximum allowable density - approximately <br />10,500 square feet per unit, as compared to the minimum lot area requirement of 7,500 <br />square feet per unit, Density of the development south of Allan Avenue is approximately <br />8,000 square feet per unit, which included street area as well. <br />In summary, the plans as proposed are consistent with the original proposal in terms of <br />density and land use. However, there are some design issues which would strengthen the <br />project. These include a greater variation in the front line of the buildings, and <br />landscaping plans which address rear yards and illustrate the screening from the north. <br />A complete grading plan should also be submitted for approval of the City Engineer. <br />The City may wish to see the additional plans prior to approval of the Preliminary Plat. <br />If approved, the approval should be made contingent on the submission of a final <br />landscaping plan and the City Engineer's approval of the grading and drainage. The <br />Planning Commission and City Council should also comment on the change which has <br />removed the cul -de -sacs from this phase of development. <br />cc: Kathy Glanzer <br />Greg Schmidt <br />Terry Maurer <br />Gordie Howe <br />Page 4 <br />