Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Craig Schlichting <br />February 10, 1999 <br />Page 2 <br />2. We commend the designer of the development for reducing the potential for erosion by <br />minimizing the grading of the Twin Lake Pines site. This indicates that the designer is aware <br />that erosion from the steep slopes on the Twin Lake Pines site has the potential of <br />destroying any resemblance of good water quality in Twin Lake. Therefore, erosion <br />controls on the Twin Lake Pines site need to be very good. We recommend that the <br />developer frequently inspect the erosion controls of Twin Lake Pines site to ensure that the <br />lake is being protected from pollution. In addition, drainage onto the steep slopes need to <br />be carefully planned in order to protect both the lots in the development and the lake from <br />erosion. <br />Currently, the site of Twin Lake Pines is wooded. The existing vegetation both protects <br />Twin Lake water quality and provides an aesthetically pleasing view for homeowners on <br />Twin Lake. The existing vegetation adjacent to Twin Lake, and on steep slopes, should be <br />protected through the use of deed restrictions, covenants, or dedicated easements. This <br />would help to ensure that the property owners are aware that a buffer of natural vegetation <br />is needed to preserve the water quality of Twin Lake and the scenic views that are important <br />to residents on the lake. In addition, the existence of natural vegetation will be beneficial <br />to the fish and wildlife of the area. <br />The following comments are general and more typical of comments given for other developments: <br />Twin Lake (62 -39P) is a DNR Protected Water. Any work that occurs below the ordinary <br />high water level of Twin Lake is under the jurisdiction of the DNR and may require a DNR <br />permit. The OHW of Twin Lake has not been determined. Should there be a question as <br />to whether the work for Twin Lake Pines will be under DNR jurisdiction, then the DNR can <br />be asked to determine, if necessary, the OHW of Twin Lake. In addition, the removal of <br />any emergent aquatic vegetation requires an aquatic plant management permit from DNR <br />Ecological Services (Mike Halverson @ 651- 772 - 7950). <br />5. It is good to see that all of the proposed structures will be built above the floodplain <br />elevation of 875.0' (NGVD, 1929). The roads and structures of Twin Lake Pines should <br />be constructed in accordance with the floodplain regulations of both the City of Little <br />Canada and the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District. <br />6. Twin Lake has a shoreland management classification of recreational development, and a <br />1000' shoreland management district. It is good to see that Twin Lake Pines will greatly <br />exceed many of the minimum development standards set in the Little Canada Shoreland <br />Management Ordinance. We recommend that a Homeowner's Association be established <br />for the homes in this development and that the following items be made part of the <br />covenants for the association: <br />Page 90 <br />A. The preservation of a buffer of uncut, natural vegetation, extending 37.5' from the <br />ordinary high water level, or to the top of the steep slopes on the lot, whichever is <br />greater. A covenant that is enforced by the Homeowners Association will ensure <br />that the property owners are aware that the vegetation beside Twin Lake is essential <br />to preserving the lake. The location of stairways to Twin Lake should be placed so <br />as to be screened from view on Twin Lake using vegetation and topography. <br />