My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-22-1999 Additions
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
06-22-1999 Additions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2012 11:00:24 AM
Creation date
8/30/2012 10:59:42 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />MAY 11, 1999 <br />LaValle suggested that the City pick the worst seven to ten properties, <br />concentrate enforcement on those properties. The Administrator felt this <br />raises concerns with consistent treatment of properties. The Administrator <br />outlined the CUP process which the Council approved for addressing the <br />individual properties and compliance issues. The Administrator reported <br />that there are property owners who want to comply with the code and are <br />making efforts to do so because they know the City is serious about its <br />enforcement efforts. The Administrator stated that staff would like to <br />work with those property owners and would issue citations to others who <br />are not making efforts to comply. <br />Fahey again suggested prioritizing the properties relative to compliance <br />issues and work from the worst offending property through the list. Fahey <br />did not feel the City had the resources to work with all the offending <br />properties at one time. <br />The Administrator indicated that there is currently a spirit of cooperation <br />in the park which he felt the City should take advantage of at this time. <br />There are property owners willing to work with the City. <br />Morelan felt there had to be some reasonableness and pointed out that it <br />was likely possible to find code violations on virtually every property in <br />the City. Morelan felt the worst violators should be targeted and definitely <br />those with junk cars. <br />Mursko stated that she began with the biggest problem in the Park, and <br />that is exterior storage. The City requires a CUP for exterior storage and <br />that has been a code requirement since the early 1980's. There are 35 <br />properties in Ryan Industrial Park and only 3 have CUP's for exterior <br />storage. All the rest have illegal exterior storage. <br />Fahey pointed out that when you drive through the Park you do not see the <br />absence of landscaping, but you do see the junk. Fahey felt the CUP's <br />should be processed to bring properties into compliance. The <br />Administrator pointed out that in processing these CUP's staff would like <br />direction from the Council on the pointed listed in Mursko's letter of April <br />29'". <br />LaValle felt that screened exterior storage areas were not as offensive to <br />him as junk cars. The Administrator asked about storage of barrels, <br />roofing materials, search lights, etc. and asked where the City would draw <br />the line. <br />PAGE 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.