Laserfiche WebLink
t, <br />SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING DATE: July 1, 2009 AGENDA ITEM:. <br />DEPARTMENT: City Attorney CITY MANAGER: Dave Anderson <br />PREPARED BY: Richard Taylor DIRECTOR: Richard Taylor <br />SUBJECT: City Council and Commissions' Electronic Communications Policy <br />RECOMMENDED ACTION: Discuss the draft City Council and Commissions' Electronic <br />Communications Policy and provide direction to staff. <br />REPORT SUMMARY: <br />City communications increasingly occur through electronic means. Over the years the City has <br />followed various formal and informal procedures for effective use of electronic communications. The <br />attached draft policy seeks to collect and coordinate those procedures into a single policy document for <br />use by the City Council and City Commissions. While the primary objective of the draft policy is to <br />promote effective use of electronic communications in conducting City business, an important secondary <br />purpose is to create a system that allows compliance with state and federal laws governing electronic <br />communications. Those laws include the Records Retention Act, the Public Records Act, the Brown Act, <br />and state and federal rules of evidence. The attached policy facilitates compliance with those laws by the <br />City, Coixncit members, and Commissioners. <br />Under the policy, the City would issue e-mail addresses to all Commissioners and Council <br />members (currently only the Council and Planning Commission have eā€¢mail.addresses). These addresses <br />would be used for all City business. Personal business via City e -mail would be prohibited. The policy <br />includes straightforward guidelines for use of City e -mail and the Internet in a manner that does not <br />violate the Brown Act or other laws (e.g., no policy discussions among Council members or <br />Commissioners via e- mait.or intemetforums). The policy is drafted in a manner that applies to any type <br />of electronic communication account issued by the City. If the City develops tools other than e-mail <br />(e.g., instant messaging) the policy would apply to use of those tools as well. <br />The policy also formalizes existing procedures for responding to e-mails from the public <br />addressed to the Council or a Commission as a whole and for responding to e-mails to less than a <br />quorum. It also establishes as formal policy for all Commissions the existing practice for Council and <br />Planning Commission of posting all agendas and minutes on the City website. <br />Finally, the policy addresses two relatively new matters. The first concerns use of e-mail during <br />Council or Commission meetings. With increasing use of laptops for notes and paperless agendas there <br />is a potential for use of e-mail during the meeting. To assure the public that their decision - makers are <br />considering only the public information presented at the meeting the policy makes clear that e-mail may <br />not be used by a.decision -maker during a meeting. The second new matters concerns e-mail retention. <br />Historically the City has printed all substantive e-mail for archival purposes. The City now has the <br />capacity to electronically archive e-mails without printing. This is reflected in the policy. <br />Page I of 2 <br />23 <br />