Laserfiche WebLink
a different Amendment was in order. <br />Council Member Holman stated the Amendment had already been accepted. <br />Council Member Burt stated if Council Member Holman did not intend her <br />Amendment to be what she stated there was an issue. <br />Council Member Klein stated Council Member Holman could make a proposed <br />Amendment that might get some support. <br />Council Member Holman withdrew her Amendment which was incorporated and <br />restated when the iPad matter moved forward to the full Council that the City <br />Attorney's office would provide language that would address transparency issues <br />that might be heightened by the presence of electronic devices at the Dais. <br />INCORPORATED LANGUAGE WITHDRAWN <br />Council Member Klein added that if in the City Attorney's professional judgment <br />she deemed the language necessary. He stated he believed the existing policies <br />already covered the transparency concern. <br />INCORPORATED INTO THE MOTION WITH CONSENT OF THE MAKER AND <br />SECONDER that the City Attorney evaluate if they need to provide Council with <br />a policy addressing transparency issues heightened by having e- devices at the <br />Dais. <br />AMENDMENT TO MOTION: Council Member Holman moved for Staff to review <br />ways to provide earlier Wednesday delivery or the day before, not Tuesday, and <br />that large items be out two weeks ahead of time. <br />Council Member Klein stated he did not accept the proposed Amendment. <br />AMENDMENT FAILED DUE TO LACK OF A•SECOND. <br />Council Member Burt stated he believed that Council Member Holman's concern <br />was that they were going backwards. He asked why the hard copies could not be <br />out by Wednesday afternoon. <br />Ms. Grider stated that the new program was effective as it allowed Staff to follow <br />the process for approval and without printed copies. She also stated that the <br />electronic method had increased workload in her department. <br />FILENAME 8 <br />38 <br />