My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-08-1998 Additions
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
07-08-1998 Additions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2012 2:37:09 PM
Creation date
10/24/2012 2:36:32 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FROM BRIGGS & MORGAN (WED) 07. 08' 98 15:24/ST. 15:23/N0. 3561732864 P 3 <br />BRIGGS ]mute ry <br />Joel Hanson <br />July 8, 1998 <br />Page 2 <br />The initial proposal you, Mr. FinreId and I developed for presentation to the Council <br />and Cinemark USA, Inc. in March. structured the transaction to take advantage of the City's <br />unique statutory powers; to minimize the credit risk to the City (by credit risks I mean the <br />risk that the Developer will not repay the City funds the City advances towards the <br />development); and to protect the City, to the greatest extent possible, front development risks <br />(by development risks I mean risks that either the cost of developing the property will be <br />greater than anticipated or the profit earned from the development of the property will be less <br />than anticipated). <br />To accomplish these goals we developed a proposal that required the City to acquire <br />and assemble the property and convey the property to the Developer using bond proceeds to <br />finance the acquisition. The Developer was obligated to purchase the property at a price <br />equal to the City's acquisition cost thus ensuring the City would have funds available to repay <br />the bonds. The Developer was required to provide a letter of credit before the City <br />commenced the acquisition process to secure the Developer's obligation to acquire the <br />property from the City after the City had assembled the property. The Developer received <br />"pay as you go" tax increments to partially reimburse the Developer for acquisition costs. <br />It is my understanding that Cinemark USA, Inc. asked you to modify this proposal to <br />allow Cinemark USA, Inc. to finance the cost of the land acquisition for the Theater Parcel <br />through the use of a Ground Lease. The use of a Ground Lease allows the Developer to <br />acquire the property without cbmmitting cash up front and without borrowing to fund the <br />acquisition. in effect, the City lends the Developer the acquisition costs and recovers those <br />costs through rent payments. The use of the Ground Lease increases the City's credit risk. <br />The City will advance funds to assemble the property upon the execution of the Lease but <br />will not be fully repaid for several years, Although Cinemark USA, Inc. has a contractual <br />obligation to make the lease payments and the City has the ability to recover the leased <br />property if Cinemark USA, Inc. does not make the required lease payments, the City bears <br />the economic risk that Cinemark USA, Inc. will fail or refuse to make lease payments and <br />that either Cinemark USA, Inc. will have inadequate assets to satisfy a judgment for the <br />balance of the lease payments or the amounts the City can care through the sale or re -lease <br />of the Ground Lease property will be insufficient to reimburse the City for the amounts it <br />95632$.1 <br />Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.