Laserfiche WebLink
FROM BRIGGS & MORGAN (NED)07. 08' 98 15:25/ST. 15:23/N0. 3561732864 P 4 <br />BRIGGS AND 0 R aeal7 <br />Joel Hanson <br />July 8, 1998 <br />Page 3 <br />advanced to assemble the site. In proceeding with the Ground Lease concept, the City is <br />implicitly accepting this credit risk. <br />In addition to the unavoidable creation of credit risk, the Developer's form of Ground <br />Lease shifts a significant portion of the development risk to the City. The mechanism in the <br />Ground Lease that shifts development risk to the City is the significant use of contingencies. <br />Cinemark USA, Inc. reserves the right to terminate the Lease for numerous causes. The <br />discoveryofunanticipated environmental contamination; the inability to obtain construction <br />contracts for the construction of the theater at prices Cinemark USA, Inc. deems acceptable; <br />the failure to receive necessary governmental approvals, unanticipated costs to correct <br />unsuitable soil conditions and uninsured casualty loss to the improvements are a few <br />examples. If Cinemark USA, Inc. exercises a contingency and terminates the Lease, the City <br />will lose the source of funds to repay the Bonds issued to finance the acquisition. <br />Another area of significant concern regarding Cinemark USA, Inc.'s form of Ground <br />Lease was the treatment of reciprocal covenants, restrictions and easements between the <br />leased property and the surrounding development property. It will be necessary to establish <br />and record a Declaration of Covenants, Restrictions and Basements creating reciprocal <br />easements between the leased property and the surrounding development property and <br />imposing reciprocal covenants and restrictions on the use of the leased property and the <br />surrounding development property. Cinemark USA, Inc.'s form of Ground Lease makes the <br />City liable to Cinemark USA, Inc. if the developer of the'surrounding development property <br />does not abide by these covenants and restrictions. It is unreasonable for Cinemark USA, <br />Inc, to require the Cityto " guarantee" the adjacentdeveloper's performance ofhis obligations <br />under the Declaration of Covenants, Restrictions and Basements. The forcer of Lease which <br />I have prepared requires Cinemark USA, Inc. and the developer of the adjacent property to <br />prepare a Declaration of Covenants, Restrictions and Basements which is acceptable to each <br />of them (and also acceptable to the City) and to draft the Declaration of Covenants, <br />Restrictions and Basements in a manner that permits the parties to enforce the agreement <br />directly against one another without placing the City in the middle. <br />While I believe that it is reasonable for the City to assume some credit risk by <br />agreeing to the Ground Lease format, I believe it is inappropriate for the Developer to use <br />956328.1 <br />Page 3 <br />