Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Spotlight Communities <br />Depending on the topic that requires utilization of a best practice analysis, staff is requesting the <br />flexibility to include cities that are doing unique and innovative work in our departments. This <br />data would specifically be called out as a “spotlight” when doing research and presenting to <br />council. <br /> <br />Public Works Spotlight Communities: Woodbury and Rosemount <br />Parks and Recreation Spotlight Community: Woodbury <br />Administration Spotlight Community: Woodbury <br /> <br />Not all departments have a spotlight community due to the nature of their work. For example, <br />compensation based research would not have a spotlight, nor would Finance. <br /> <br />Questions or purposes of discussion: <br />1. Does this council support use of these department specific lists? <br />a. Do you have other recommendations? <br /> <br />Strategic Priority: <br />Strategic Direction: Creating Supportive Networks <br /> <br />Action Items: Share strategic plan with neighboring communities and engage other cities to <br />develop area best practices. <br /> <br />Subitem to accomplish action item: Develop council supported list of approved community <br />comparable for best practices <br /> <br />Source Of Funds: <br />• The creation of a community comparable list has no cost implication. However, the <br />approved compensation study list will likely have financial implications in the future as <br />the implementation scenarios are proposed by MGT. <br /> <br />Staff Recommendations: <br />• Discuss the presented comparable communities lists (Compensation, Administration, <br />Finance, Public Works, Parks, and Community Development). <br /> <br />Attachments: <br />• None