My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-13-1998 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
05-13-1998 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2012 9:03:35 AM
Creation date
10/25/2012 9:02:07 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Rating System <br />We have found that relating a normal maintenance or rehabilitation <br />procedure to the surface rating scheme helps local officials use the <br />rating system. However, choosing an individual surface rating should <br />not automatically dictate the final maintenance or rehabilitation tech- <br />nique. You should consider future traffic projections, original con- <br />struction, and pavement strength since these may dictate a more <br />comprehensive rehabilitation. On the other hand, it may be appropri- <br />ate under special conditions to do nothing and let the pavement fully <br />deteriorate, then rebuild when funds are available. <br />Individual pavements will not have all of the types of distress <br />listed for any particular rating. They may have only one or two <br />types. <br />Caution <br />Rating a roadway segment will involve evaluating conditions over a <br />considerable length (for example, a mile or more in rural areas or <br />many blocks in urban areas). Obviously no roadway segment has <br />entirely consistent conditions. Therefore, some "averaging" is neces- <br />sary. The objective is to rate the condition that represents the major- <br />ity of the pavement. Small or isolated conditions should not influence <br />the rating. It is useful to note these special conditions on the rating <br />form so this information can be used in project design. For example, <br />some spot patching or wedging may be required. <br />Occasionally pavement conditions vary significantly. For example, <br />short sections of good condition may be followed by sections of poor <br />pavement conditions. In these cases it is best to rate the pavement <br />according to the worst conditions and note the variability on the form. <br />The overall purpose of condition rating is to provide a relative com- <br />parison of the condition of all your pavement segments. Therefore, <br />comparing any two pavement segments would show the better pave- <br />ment with a higher rating. Within a given rating, say 7, not all pave- <br />ments will be exactly the same. However, they should all be consid- <br />ered to be in better condition than those with lower ratings, say 5. <br />Sometimes it is helpful in rating a difficult segment to compare it to <br />other previously rated segments. For example, if it is better than one <br />you rated 5 and worse than a typical 7, then a rating of 6 is appropri- <br />ate. Having all pavement segments rated in the proper relative order <br />is most important and useful. <br />Page 50 <br />Additional tips <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.