My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-25-1998 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
02-25-1998 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2014 3:21:21 PM
Creation date
10/25/2012 9:05:06 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor & City Council <br />February 20, 1998 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />As part of this I/I study, I would like to implement a sump pump inspection program. In 1993, <br />the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, now known as Metropolitan Council <br />Environmental Services, did a metro area infiltration/inflow study. Their study identified Little <br />Canada as a City with high groundwater I /I. At that time, it was estimated that 30% of the <br />385,000,000 gallons going to the Met Council was groundwater infiltration. (Please see <br />accompanying graphs.) This same study also estimated rainfall dependent I/I at 5 %. Ground <br />water infiltration is ground water that enters a collection system through such sources as cracked <br />pipes, leaky joints and deteriorated manholes during dry weather periods. Rain fall dependent I/I <br />includes infiltration from sources that are influenced by temporarily elevated ground water levels <br />during and after rainfall events and inflow which is storm water run -off or snow melt that flows <br />into direct connections to the collection system from sources such as connected rain leaders, area <br />drains, holes in manhole covers, cross connections from storm sewers and connected catch <br />basins. Sump pumps that are improperly connected to the sanitary sewer system could fall under <br />either ground water infiltration or rainfall dependent infiltration depending on when they are <br />running. <br />The base sanitary sewer flow is simply arrived at by looking at the amount of water that was <br />metered into the system and making the assumption that all the metered water eventually makes <br />its way into the sanitary sewer system, typically using December, January, and February as base <br />flow months to eliminate water usage such as for lawn watering. As you can see, it appears we <br />can remove a lot of clear water from the system. I believe one of the most cost effective ways to <br />reduce clear water entering our sanitary sewer system is to implement a sump pump inspection <br />program whereby we would inspect every property that is connected to the municipal sanitary <br />sewer system. <br />Enclosed for your information is a proposed sump pump inspection program timeline, a request <br />for proposals for private property sump pump inspections, a proposed ordinance update to our <br />Section 205.080., a copy of our existing ordinance, copies of an inspection form and compliance <br />certificate, and an information packet that would be mailed to all properties that are connected to <br />the sanitary sewer system prior to beginning the inspection program. I have also included a nine- <br />city survey taken by the City of Plymouth that summarizes other selected cities' sump pump <br />inspection programs <br />I anticipate inspection quotes to fall within the range of $15 to $25 per property ($33,500- <br />$56,000 for all connections). Printing and mailing costs should be approximately $2,000. Based <br />on other communities reduction in flows after implementing a sump pump inspection program, I <br />believe the payback period for this proposed program is less than two years. <br />The following items should also be given consideration: <br />Page 81 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.