My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-25-1998 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
02-25-1998 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2014 3:21:21 PM
Creation date
10/25/2012 9:05:06 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor & City Council <br />February 20, 1998 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />• If there is an area where a lot of sump pumps are discharging towards the street, we may <br />need to look into installing a drain tile system behind the curb that picks up this water and <br />carries it to the storm sewer system. Typically, this would only be a problem due to ice <br />during the winter months. Until the inspection is complete, we cannot identify if this will <br />be a problem or to what extent. I recommend we wait until the sump pump inspection is <br />complete and then determine the most cost effective method to deal with this issue if it <br />arises. <br />• Addressing roof drains and footing drains that are connected to the sanitary sewer system <br />could be another problem. As of now, without televising the individual laterals that lead <br />to each property, we do not know if footing or roofing drains are connected to the system. <br />As part of the sump pump inspection program, we would be certifying that the sump <br />pump system itself is in compliance and not the property footing and roofing drains. <br />Bringing footing and roofing drains into compliance would require televising of <br />individual laterals and retrofitting existing individual systems. This work could require <br />new downspouts, excavation work, and quite possibly inside concrete and finish work. I <br />recommend we wait until the sump pump inspection is complete and then determine if <br />roofing and footing drains are a problem and to what extent. The cost of televising <br />individual sewer laterals would be approximately $100 each. By waiting until sump <br />pump inspection and subsequent mapping is complete, we will be better informed as to <br />where potential problem areas are located. <br />• Should the City help with the cost of bringing individual homes into compliance? <br />Currently, we have 2,231 sanitary sewer connections to our system. Using figures from <br />other cities who have implemented programs of this type anywhere from 5% to 15% of <br />the homes potentially have sump pumps not in compliance. Using these percentages, <br />anywhere from 110 to 340 properties could potentially have sump pumps that will now <br />be required to discharge to the outside of the building. The costs associated with <br />retrofitting to a rigid PVC system can range anywhere from $50 (do- it- yourselfer with an <br />unfinished basement) to as much as $300 (hiring a contractor to complete work in a <br />finished basement). Some cities have implemented rebate programs to help with the cost <br />of the retrofit. They have typically been in the $75 to $100 range. Remember, the 85% <br />to 95% of the properties that do not have sump pumps have been subsidizing the <br />properties that do have sump pumps in the form of increased sewer costs due to the <br />additional flows created by those improper connections. Since our first sanitary sewer <br />improvement, it has been against our ordinance to discharge surface water of any kind <br />into the sanitary sewer system (ordinance 205.080). I believe it would also be viewed as <br />penalizing those properties that have properly connected their sump pumps. Therefore, I <br />recommend the City does not implement a rebate program <br />Page 82 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.