Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />NOVEMBER 28, 2012 <br />Keis questioned Donovan's ability to sell the tower independent of the <br />property sale. The City Administrator replied that they would sell the <br />lease itself. He was concerned, however, that as part of the redevelopment <br />of this area, the tower could end up on a separate piece of property <br />depending on where the road is brought in. While under current Code, a <br />tower is not allowed on a separate piece of property as it is considered an <br />accessory use, the Code could be changed to accommodate this. <br />Blesener asked how long the lease appraisal would take noting that <br />Donovan would like to move quickly on the sale of the property. The <br />Administrator replied that the appraisal could be completed within two <br />weeks. He indicated the appraising company has a huge data base from <br />which to draw, and are experienced and knowledgeable in valuing these <br />leases. McGraw asked if the company has the means of providing <br />information to the City that would help the City market the tower for <br />additional leasing. The Administrator felt that their data base was strong <br />enough to provide this type of information, but indicated that he would <br />discuss that with the appraising company. <br />Montour stated that he had concerns with how Donovan can sell off the <br />tower or the lease, noting that a tower is an accessory use. The City <br />Planner indicated that it is common that a property owner not own a cell <br />tower that is located on their property. The property owner leases the land <br />for the tower. <br />The Administrator felt that the City should know all the facts before <br />making a decision on the purchase of the Donovan property, and <br />recommended that the City obtain the tower lease appraisal. Again, the <br />Administrator indicated that as part of the redevelopment of the area the <br />tower may end up on its own parcel subject to a Code modification. He <br />felt that finding out the true value of the tower lease will be a beneficial <br />piece of information for the City. <br />Keis introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2012 -11 -212 — APPROVING THE CONSULTING <br />AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LITTLE CANADA AND <br />STEEL IN THE AIR, INC. FOR VALUATION OF THE DONOVAN <br />TOWER LEASE AT A COST NOT TO EXCEED $2,000 AS <br />RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY ADMINISTRATION, AND <br />DIRECTING THE ADMINISTRATOR TO ASK FOR INFORMATION <br />ON FUTURE MARKETING OF THE TOWER LEASE <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Montour. <br />Ayes (5). <br />14 <br />