Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />APRIL 9, 2008 <br />Waite first addressed the issue of pollutants indicating that four years ago <br />he reported to the City that there was some substance coming from the <br />storm sewer drains at the Demont hockey rink that was not clear water. At <br />that time the City Administrator indicated that he would have this checked <br />out. Waite reported that the next year he observed what looked like anti- <br />freeze coming from this drain. He reported this to the City Administrator <br />and the Watershed. Waite indicated that he was informed that the School <br />was contacted and they indicated in cleaning their machinery used for <br />striping ballfields, there was a chalky residue washed into the storm water <br />system. Waite indicated that the storm water did not have a white chalky <br />appearance. Waite then reported that the next year he noticed the problem <br />again and brought a water sample to the Watershed. The School was <br />contacted and indicated that they rinsed out some latex paint cans and this <br />residue flowed into the storm drains, and Waite pointed out into the lake <br />system. Waite reported that he gave yet another water sample to the City <br />and the Watershed and was told that they do not know what is in the <br />water. Waite pointed out that there are tests that can be done to find out <br />what is in the water. <br />Waite felt someone needs to step forward and address this pollution <br />problem. He indicated that he has contacted the PCA, DNR, Watershed, <br />and the City with no success. Waite felt that the City should take a <br />proactive approach to stop this, pointing out that what flows into the storm <br />sewer system ends up in the lakes. <br />Waite then addressed the issue of the level of Savage bake. He reported <br />that he contacted the Watershed who informed him that the DNR controls <br />the lake level. He then contacted the DNR who informed him that the <br />Watershed controls the lake level. In again contacting the Watershed, they <br />did acknowledge that they control the lake level. <br />Blesener outlined the history of the replacement of the gate system about <br />four years ago that existed on Savage Lake which controlled the water <br />level. Once that system was replaced, the lake level returned to its natural <br />levels, which was about two feet lower than it had been. Blesener noted <br />that the property owners around the lake felt the level was too low, when i1 <br />had, in fact, been artificially high. In working with the Watershed and the <br />DNR on that issue, it was agreed that the lake level could be raised one <br />foot. However, given the past few dry summers, the lake level has not <br />reached that level. Blesener also noted that last summer property owners <br />around the lake expressed concern about the amount of lily pads on the <br />lake, and the Watershed provided information to the property owners as to <br />how to obtain permits to treat for lily pads approximately LO feet from <br />their shorelines. Blesener also noted that when lake levels are low, <br />vegetation grows more densely. Waite commented that lily pads grow in <br />about three feet of water and not much more. <br />