06-25-1997 Additions - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

06/22/97 14:45 L1J:02 NO:220 MEMO TO: Kathy Glanzer, Sott Tangen FROM: Paul Heuer RE: Minnesota Mini- forage FILE: BRA File No. 37 - gen/372 -247 DATE: June 23, 1997 Bonestroo Rosette Andedik & Associates snows it Architects We have received and revie ed the site and utility plan dated 5 -22-97 for the above mentioned project and offer the following co nts. SANITARY SEER No sanitary sewer is proposed. We assume that this means that no office area is proposed on the site. WATER MAIN We recommend that all line proposed on private property be privately owned and maintained. STORM DRAIN GE We recommend that all line proposed on private property be privately owned and maintained. The proposed storm drains ` system is shown connecting to a private system to the east. Drainage of this eastern property may affected by the additional flow through the pipes. It is uncertain whether this system was design to c!�nvey flows generated by the developing property. We recommend that the owner of the property to th$ east (if different from this developer) be contacted for his approval of the atone design. Regardless cf whether the existing system was designed to handle the additional flows. drainage from system backIrps will not enter any public streets or facilities. Therefore, we are not opposed to the proposed drainage system. We recommend that the ov point to minimize damage t STREET The design calls for an east' The location of the eastern traffic volumes on County I may be compromised under it. Approval from Ramse investigate the potential a property to the east. er install Enkamat or some other type of erosion inhibitor at the overflow his property and sediment conveyed to the adjacent property. and a west entrance to the site to allow for easy traffic circulation internally. entrance is extremely close to an entrance to the property to the east. The toad B are approximately 2,700 vehicles per day. We feel that traffic safety the proposed configuration, and therefore cannot recommend acceptance of County will be required on this issue. We recommend that the owner replacing the eastern access with an access served internally from the Given the fact that a tall re ning wall separates this property from the property to the east, and heavy truck traffic may be expec to circulated along the east side of the property, we suggest that the owner perform a soils global stabi ity analysis to ensure that no earth movements will occur. Page 1