My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-24-1997 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
09-24-1997 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2013 11:43:08 AM
Creation date
3/11/2013 11:39:29 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
fully. Evaluating should take little time away <br />from the program, activity, or event. <br />Make language appropriate. Remember <br />varying reading levels and different first lan- <br />guages when creating evaluation materials. <br />Evaluate the program not the participants. <br />Participants should understand that their re- <br />sponses and comments are being used to evalu- <br />ate and improve the program. This will put <br />youth at ease, encourage more honest answers, <br />and, ultimately, develop a better program. <br />Use established evaluation materials. Al- <br />though it is tempting, and sometimes necessary, <br />to create your own evaluation materials, you <br />will get better and more readily accepted results <br />with established tests. <br />Don't over measure. While this may seem <br />like strange advice, it is possible to over mea- <br />sure. The most valuable information will come <br />from measuring only the most important aspects <br />of your cities youth program, event, or activity. <br />"If we are going to meet the <br />challenges of developing <br />healthy youth and healthy <br />cities, we must analyze the <br />effectiveness of our efforts and <br />be willing to accept the <br />messages our data reveals. " <br />Even when evaluation results do not match <br />initial hopes and expectations, the research is an <br />important tool. If we are going to meet the <br />challenges of developing healthy youth and <br />healthy cities, we must analyze the effectiveness <br />of our efforts and be willing to accept the mes- <br />sages our data reveals. Evaluation is the starting <br />point from which we can measure success and <br />recommend improvements. t <br />i Edward C. Siegel is president of the Center for <br />Evaluation Research. To find out more about evalua- <br />tion tools, Evaluation Instrument Battery: Pre - <br />vention Programs for High Risk Youth, is avail- <br />able from the Center for Evaluation Research, 219 <br />SE Main Street, Suite 3030, Minneapolis, MN <br />55414 or call (800) 353 -3390. Graphic based on <br />information in Critical Needs, Critical Choices: <br />A Survey on Children and Families in <br />America's Cities, a March 1996 publication of the <br />National League of Cities. <br />INC R E A SIN G RESOURCES FOR C.H I LD.REN , YOUTH, -A -N.D F -AiM I L I ES <br />City officials relayed . several lessons to the National League of Cities that have been helpful: in promoting <br />an increase in resources available for children, youth, and families in their cities. <br />1. It is important to use financing to support the city's <br />mission and goals, rather than have available dollars drive <br />programs. <br />5. Design strategies that are broad and appeal :tolall sec- <br />tors of the community_ Such approaches create more di <br />verse ownership and investments in the outcomes. <br />6. Giving neighborhoods or smaller communities some <br />..,authority over :. how dollars are spent for children and <br />families increases their-buy-in -and support. <br />7- Build collaborative relationships. Bringing people <br />together increases people's investment as taxpayers and as <br />,..participants in the political process. <br />- 8. Frame an investment in children and youth as an <br />economic investment. The potential of improving out -.: <br />comesfor children, particularly young chuldren, is linked <br />to the future economic vitality of a community. <br />9_ Don't be afraid to ask the private sector for money, <br />2. If the city has a vision and a process for citizen input, <br />citizens are more willing to support tax increase. A:num- <br />ber of cities used an extensive participatory process—some- <br />times involving several thousand children,- youth, and <br />adults —to develop their vision and strategic plan for chil- <br />dren in their community. These processes not only result in <br />better plans, but build public will for enhanced financing. <br />3. The public is willing to fund services` for children and <br />families when convinced those services are delivered effi- <br />ciently and that expenditures produce results. <br />4. Getting the media on board to pickup on what your <br />city is doing and explain it to the publicbuilds - support. <br />Repented with permission from the New Directions • brief— For Cities, Families, and Children a 1997 publication of the National <br />League of Cities. For more information, contact John E; Kyle, Program Director, Children and Families in Cities, National. League of <br />Cities, 1301 Pennsylvania. Avenue N.W.,. Washington ,`D.C.::20004.::Telephone::( 202).626- 3030.E - mail :;kyte@nlc.org <br />10 <br />Page 80 <br />AUGUST 1997 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.