Laserfiche WebLink
6— Focus News -- Thies. May 9; 1996 <br />Opinio <br />Page 16 <br />3 COh1Ai13NTARv 4 <br />Health depts.' merger shifts <br />tax burden to the suburbs <br />BRENDA'hIioMA.s <br />On April 12, an editorial appeared in the Pioneer Press trum- <br />peting the benefits of a proposed merger of the Ramsey County <br />and St. Paul public health departments. The headline read, <br />"1lealth <br />departments' plan deserves support" <br />I strongly disagree with this conclusion. What is being pro- <br />posed is not a merger at all. It is ajoint powers agreement, ate <br />main provisions of which are as follows. <br />• It maintains both the county and city public health agencies. <br />• It provides for the contracting of public health employees <br />between the county and city ( "it is agreed that nothing contained <br />in this agreement is intended or should be construed as consti- <br />tuting either party as the employee of the other party for any <br />purpose or in any manner whatsoever'). <br />• It conveys a city -owned public health building to the county. <br />The building must continue to be utilized for public health pur- <br />poses. If the agreement is terminated the building reverts to the <br />city's ownership. <br />• It provides for oversight by a 21- member John Community <br />1 health Services Advisory Committee, which will recommend <br />budget and service decisions. At least 13 members must repre- <br />sent the city of St. Paul. <br />• It preserves all city public health jobs which are to be vacat- <br />ed only through attrition. <br />• It shifts the S1 million costs of contracting for the city's <br />employees to suburban taxpayers, which represents a one -half <br />percent tax increase in the suburbs and an equal lax reduction in <br />the city. <br />With this joint- powers agreement as a launching poinl,,eventu- <br />ally when the last city public health employee has resigned or • • <br />retired, those vacated positions may be filled within the coun- <br />ty's public health department as county employees. When that <br />day arrives, a true merger of the two agencies might then be <br />accomplished. <br />Why is 0 true merger not being proposed right now? For the <br />same reason the county and city library systems, the county and <br />city public safety agencies and public works deparuncnts are not <br />contemplated for merging. Because St. Paul city employees arc <br />paid more than their counterparts in the county or the suburbs. <br />This despite due fact that suburban municipalities in Ramsey <br />County, and Ramsey County itself, employ union workers and <br />their elected officials must negotiate with bargaining units 011 <br />wages and benefits just as St. Paul must. St. Paul elected offi- <br />cials are responsible for this disparity, not the unions. <br />Therefore, to be reasonable, any employment contract with the <br />city should provide compensation at the county's wage scale, <br />not the city's. The mayor and St. Paul City Council would then <br />be responsible for making up the "shortfall" from city revenues, <br />or negotiating reductions with their bargaining units. <br />The proposal before us entirely relieves city officials of this <br />responsibility. It simply shifts S1 million in employee compen- <br />sation to suburban taxpayers who largely do not receive the ser- <br />vices of either public health agency. This cost shift will increase <br />the taxes for suburban property owners one -half percent. On a <br />suburban properly valued at $115,000, this amounts to a S10 <br />increase, and on an equal - valued St. Paul property, a decrease of <br />$12. <br />To put this 31 million lax increase in perspective, I want to <br />underscore one final point. <br />The Ramsey County library .system is supported entirely by <br />suburban taxpayers. Our heavily utilized libraries operate on an <br />annual budget of $6 million, which is SI million less than is <br />needed for inventory, infornation technology, and operations. <br />In 2 recent survey of suburban Ramsey County residents, an <br />overwhelming majority of respondents indicated that they <br />would support a small increase in their property taxes to <br />improve library services. <br />Flow much revenue could be generated for our library system <br />if we increased suburban taxes by one -half percent? - nearly 31 <br />million. <br />I would hesitate to impose 0 tax increase 00 suburban taxpay- <br />ers even to improve library services, for which there is over- <br />whelming support. I certainly would not vote in favor of a <br />scheme that shifts the excessive costs of St. Paul's government <br />to suburban taxpayers. 'Ibis is what the proposed public health <br />merger would do. Indeed, it appears to be the proposal's sole <br />intent. <br />Brenda Thomns is a Ramsey County Commissioner <br />