My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-22-1996 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
05-22-1996 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2013 9:16:06 AM
Creation date
3/12/2013 9:12:04 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
127
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 119 <br />Many Minnesota stores sell <br />tobacco to minors, study says <br />"If we had a law that every At a glance: <br />retailer across the state had to <br />comply with, the rate could be Tobacco sales to minors <br />even better," said Judy Cook, An antismoking project fed by the <br />president of the Minnesota Retail Minnesota Health Department and <br />Merchants Association. the Minnesota division of the Ameri- <br />In the 1996 legislative session, can Cancer Society tested whether <br />retailers backed such a bill, which stores are illegally selling tobacco <br />they touted as the strongest in to minors. Under the supervision of <br />the nation. But it failed because adults, children under age 18 tried <br />of their insistence that it also bar to buy tobacco in 914 stores in 49 <br />Ideal governments from enacting communities around the state. The <br />anything tougher. Antismoking tests showed that in communities <br />forces refused to accept that pro- with local ordinances regulating to- <br />vision, called local preemption, bacco sales, stores were less likely <br />and considered the bill's defeat a to sell tobacco to minors. Here are <br />victory for their cause. the results of the compliance <br />• Jeanne Weigum, president of checks in metro area communities. <br />the Association for Nonsmokers- <br />Minnesota, said the bill was un- Cities with youth access ordinances <br />acceptable because its penalties Shakopee 39% <br />against merchants were too weak. Plymouth 36% <br />In addition, she said, the political North St. Paul 20% <br />process of enacting local tobacco Falcon Heights 20% <br />ordinances raises community Shoreview 16% <br />Stillwater 14% <br />New Brighton .. ...... ....... 9% <br />Eden Prairie 7% <br />awareness and involvement in <br />the teen smoking issue in a way <br />that state legislation cannot. <br />"These findings show why to- <br />bacco lobbyists are pulling out all <br />the stops to try to ban local to- <br />bacco ordinances," Humphrey <br />said. "They know that if kids <br />don't start smoking as minors .. . <br />most won't start at all." <br />Under state law, selling tobac- <br />co to a minor is a gross misde- <br />meanor. It is seldom enforced <br />against store clerks, however, and <br />contains no penalties for propri- <br />etors. A growing number of cities <br />have enacted such penalties, <br />ranging from fines to license sus- <br />pensions and revocations, but <br />many more have not. <br />In the spot checks, none of the <br />19 cities and townships with <br />strong local tobacco laws had <br />more than 49 percent noncompli- <br />ance. The spot checks were con- <br />ducted at 914 stores over the past <br />seven months by youths working <br />with adult supervision. The pro- <br />ject was sponsored by the Minne- <br />sota Health Department and the <br />Minnesota division of the Ameri- <br />can Cancer Society. <br />In some places, new laws pro- <br />duced startling results. In Fergus <br />Falls, for example, compliance <br />checks before passage of a local <br />ordinance showed 50 percent of <br />the stores selling to minors. In <br />the latest survey, that was cut to 3 <br />percent. <br />Noncompliance in areas with- <br />out local laws ranged from 0 to <br />100 percent. One of the 100 per- <br />cent towns was Rush City, in the <br />"strict of the local preemption <br />Cities without ordinances <br />Prior Lake . __.100% <br />Ramsey. .„ 100% <br />St. Croix Beach ........... _100% <br />Forest Lake ............ _. .... _...... „_._...__. 84% <br />Oak Park Heights . „._. „.._„ 75% <br />Wayzata 73% <br />Bloomington 67% <br />Hopkins 67% <br />Burnsville 52% <br />South St. Paul 35% <br />White Bear Lake 33% <br />Richfield 30% <br />Inver Grove Heights 12% <br />Maplewood 10% <br />Bayport 0% <br />Lake Elmo 0% <br />Lakeland 0% <br />bill's sponsor, DFL Rep. Loren <br />Jennings. <br />Minneapolis and St. Paul were <br />not included in the survey, which <br />covered towns in 22 counties. <br />Prior Lake, Bloomington, Forest <br />Lake, Hopkins, Oak Park Heights, <br />Ramsey and Wayzata — all Twin <br />Cities suburbs without strong or- <br />dinances — showed at least two - <br />thirds of stores selling to minors. <br />"It was kind of weird that so <br />many clerks sold to me,” said one <br />undercover 17- year -old who got <br />cigarettes at 12 of 16 stores in <br />Bloomington. "I don't think I <br />look like I'm 18, but they just set <br />the cigarettes on the counter and <br />said, 'Here you go.' " <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.