Laserfiche WebLink
Regulating <br />tobacco sales <br />KENT SULEM <br />tudies indicate that a vast <br />majority of smokers start <br />smoking by the time they <br />are 18. Studies also show <br />that if individuals can make <br />it to 18 without starting to <br />smoke, they will likely never become <br />smokers. Minnesota Statute 609.685 <br />makes it illegal to sell tobacco and <br />tobacco related products and devices to <br />anyone under the age of 18 years. The <br />statute also makes it a misdemeanor for <br />any person under the age of 18 to <br />possess tobacco or tobacco related <br />products and devices. Despite these <br />legal prohibitions, it is a common sight <br />to see groups of teenagers smoking <br />outside of school buildings, fast food <br />restaurants and other popular teen <br />hangouts. <br />Cities frequently ask two questions <br />when faced with the issue of smoking <br />by minors. The first question is, "Why <br />should cities worry about this prob- <br />lem?" There are several reasons why <br />cities should be interested in curbing <br />illegal smoking by minors. First, <br />smoking by minors is a violation of the <br />law. Cities should always be interested <br />in reducing the amount of illegal <br />activities occurring within their limits. <br />Second, and related to the first reason, <br />a city's overall image is enhanced by <br />creating a cleaner and healthier <br />environment for its youth and adults. <br />Finally, smoking related health care <br />costs drain federal and state budgets of <br />millions of dollars per year. Tightly <br />enforcing the law and reducing the <br />number of underage smokers will help <br />reduce government spending for <br />smoking related health care costs, thus <br />freeing up funds to be used for other <br />city interests. <br />The second question cities ask when <br />confronted with the problem of <br />smoking by minors is, "What can we do <br />about it ?" This question is answered by <br />state law authorizing cities to adopt an <br />ordinance at least as restrictive as the <br />requirements of M.S. 609.685. Such an <br />ordinance would allow a city to take <br />responsibility for enforcing the <br />prohibition of the sale to and the <br />possession by minors of tobacco and <br />tobacco related products and devices. <br />Several cities across Minnesota. and <br />nationwide. have already adopted very <br />strong ordinances regulating the sale <br />and possession of tobacco and tobacco <br />products and devices. Some cities in <br />the United States are also adopting new <br />and innovative ways to combat the <br />problem. <br />The courts appear to be allowing <br />increasingly restrictive regulations as <br />long as the primary purpose of the <br />ordinances is to prohibit unlawful <br />access by youth to tobacco and tobacco <br />related products and devices. Restric- <br />tions on the advertising of cigarettes <br />and other tobacco products and <br />related devices are also becoming <br />increasingly popular. Several decided <br />and current cases will determine the <br />extent that such advertisements can be <br />restricted. <br />A city interested in regulating the <br />sale of tobacco and tobacco related <br />products and devices to minors, should <br />consider adopting the following types <br />of provisions: <br />Require all vendors of tobacco <br />and tobacco related products and <br />devices to obtain a license to sell <br />such items. <br />Treat the license like any other <br />license, but set the fee high enough to <br />help cover minimal inspections of <br />licensed premises. Fees of $200 to <br />$500 per year are common. Some <br />cities are finding success with a <br />graduated fee schedule that sets the <br />initial fee at an amount, such as $500, <br />and provides discounts if the store <br />owner agrees not to have vending <br />machines, prohibits or restricts self - <br />access, or trains the store's clerks in <br />checking for age identification and in <br />spotting false identification cards. <br />A pro -rated fee schedule provides an <br />incentive for the vendor to take some <br />action, rather than relying solely on <br />city regulations and involvement. The <br />Page 120 <br />ordinance should also provide that the <br />illegal sale of tobacco or tobacco <br />related products and devices shall be <br />grounds for the suspension and /or <br />revocation of the license. A graduated <br />penalty scale is advisable with increas- <br />ing suspensions for initial violations <br />and revocation after multiple viola- <br />tions. A penalty scale will encourage <br />store owners to require their clerks to <br />ask for proof of age before selling <br />tobacco or tobacco related products <br />and devices 10 anyone who appears to <br />be under the age of 18 years. <br />Regulate cigarette vending <br />machines. <br />Since vending machines offer minors <br />easy access to tobacco products, the <br />courts have been receptive to tight <br />restrictions on such machines. Some <br />cities completely ban vending ma- <br />chines, while others require that <br />machines have restricted access and be <br />in the plain view of employees so that <br />only persons who are at least 18 can <br />obtain cigarettes. <br />Prohibit self - service stations of <br />tobacco and tobacco products <br />and devices. <br />This provision would make it illegal <br />for stores to have open racks of <br />cigarettes. Tobacco and tobacco <br />related products and devices would be <br />kept behind the counter and would <br />only be accessible to employees, thus <br />reducing access by minors as well as <br />cutting down on the risk of shoplifting. <br />At the very least, a city should prohibit <br />the self - service display of individual <br />packages of cigarettes. <br />Make it a misdemeanor for <br />minors to possess tobacco or <br />tobacco related products and <br />• devices. <br />The ordinance should also make it a <br />misdemeanor to alter one's age by use <br />of false identification, or by use of <br />another person's identification. This is <br />the current law, but such a provision <br />allows for easier local enforcement. <br />In addition, the ordinance should <br />define all major terms and specify <br />enforcement procedures, such as the <br />right of the city to perform random <br />...- MINNESGTA C;T:ES AUGUS -'^-: <br />.3 <br />