My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-24-1996 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
04-24-1996 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2014 1:10:46 PM
Creation date
3/13/2013 9:12:40 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />APRIL 11, 1996 <br />Knudsen felt the Commission should given Mr. Battista <br />some directional guidance as to what it would find <br />acceptable. <br />The City Planner indicated that this guidance would be <br />helpful to staff as well. <br />Knudsen felt the building size should not be more than <br />1,500 square feet. <br />Schletty stated that he is opposed to the height and <br />square footage proposed. Schletty indicated he <br />envisions a stick -built building. Schletty agreed it <br />would be better to have vehicles stored in a building. <br />However, pointed out that Battista already has two <br />double -car garages, and with the addition of this <br />building would have storage for 8 to 9 vehicles. <br />Schletty felt this was excessive. <br />Knudsen felt if the Planning Commission was inclined to <br />approve a building that is 1,500 square feet in size, <br />it should say so. <br />Schletty replied that if the building looked like it <br />fit on the lot and in the neighborhood, he would <br />consider it. Schletty felt, however, that 1,500 square <br />feet was a big garage. <br />Keis indicated he would be more inclined to support a <br />building closer to the 1,000 square foot size. <br />Schletty pointed out that Mr. Battista is already <br />working with storage for four vehicles. <br />Keis pointed out another issue is the easement and <br />whether or not Mr. Battista should be allowed to use <br />the easement for access to his building. <br />Schletty felt vacation of the easement would be an <br />issue for the City Council. <br />The Planner indicated that the Planning Commission's <br />recommendation on the easement issue would be valuable <br />to the Council. <br />Schletty pointed out there is no sewer line or other <br />utilities within the easement. Schletty also did not <br />believe it was possible to build a street along this <br />6 <br />Page 35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.