My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-13-1985 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
02-13-1985 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2013 7:46:34 AM
Creation date
3/19/2013 7:44:58 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINNESOTA <br />HOUSING <br />FINANCE <br />AGENCY <br />February, 1985 - - <br />SUMMARY OF HUD RENTAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM <br />Program Funding <br />For fiscal year 1985 the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) <br />allocated $1,796,000 to the State of Minnesota for the operation of the Rental <br />Rehabilitation Program. The following five communities received funds directly: <br />Duluth, Minneapolis, St. Paul, Hennepin County, and Dakota County. The remainder <br />of funds ($696,000) was allocated to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. The <br />HUD regulations allow the Agency to work with communities that are not either within <br />Farmers Home jurisdiction or are not direct entitlement communities for the <br />purpose of administering the program. Eighty -eight communities in the State <br />are in a position to receive a portion of the Agency's funding allocation. <br />The majority of these communities are in the 7- County Metropolitan Area; _13... <br />communities are out - state. <br />Program Theory <br />The basic theory of operation of the new Rental Rehabilitation Program is as <br />follows: <br />- Minnesota Housing Finance Agency receives two allocations of funds. One fund <br />is used to provide subsidies to rental property owners for the physical rehabili- <br />tation of rental property. The second funding source is an allocation of housing <br />vouchers that are used to provide rental payment subsidies to tenants residing in <br />the rehabilitated properties. <br />- The subsidy provided to the rental property owner for the physical rehabilita- <br />tion of the property is in the form of a grant. Property owners must match the <br />grant dollar for dollar with their own source of funds. Financial feasibility of <br />building is evaluated to determine that 1) the building has a positive cash flow <br />after rehab, 2) rents will be maintained at affordable levels after rehab without <br />rent controls, and 3) rents are at rent market levels (as opposed to HUD Fair <br />Market Rents). <br />- Subsidies to the tenants are designed to eliminate displacement that may occur <br />because after -rehab rents are higher than pre -rehab rents; however, tenants <br />are under no obligation to stay in the rehabilitated building. Tenants may move <br />and take their rent subsidies with them. <br />- Given the flexibility that tenants have with regard to where they may live with <br />the tenant subsidy, buildings must be selected based on the financial feasibility <br />of the building given market rents, the building's rents, area vacancy rates, <br />and the cash flow for the building. <br />333 Sibley Street. Suite 200, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 (612) 226 -7633 <br />Equal Opportunity Housing and Equal Opportunity Employment <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.