Laserfiche WebLink
W -_ <br />* Continue to license under a pre- existing municipal ordinance. There is <br />the potential for dual licensing under this option, and it is less than <br />clear whether a city could require a local license if the state has <br />issued a license, since one state law prohibits local licensing if the <br />gambling operator has obtained a state license and another continues to <br />allow local licensing between March 1 and June 1. <br />* Enact an emergency ordinance allowing continued local licensing. This <br />option assumes a city wants to license locally but has repealed their <br />local license. Cities would probably choose to re -adopt their repealed <br />gambling licensing ordinances. An additional fee is allowed for <br />extending existing local licenses or for issuing new local licenses. <br />While this mash -mash of options is certainly confusing, it reflects an <br />intention of the legislature to reduce the burden on local government due to <br />the delay in state regulation. City officials who would like to discuss their <br />city's options are encouraged to call Joel Jamnik at the League office. <br />DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE BILL <br />The Local Finance Division of the House Committee on Taxes made several <br />amendments to H.F. 556 before recommending that it pass. This is the <br />Department of Revenue's bill which would clarify existing statutory language <br />and address administrative concerns. It would repeal the coefficient of <br />dispersion penalty which provides that a city's LGA could be reduced if a <br />city's sales ratio comparing the assessor's market value to actual sales was <br />too low. The League has long sought repeal of this provision. An amendment <br />the division added would provide that for a property to qualify for the <br />confession of judgment provisions for late property tax payment, the homestead <br />portion must be at least 25 percent of the total market value. The committee <br />also approved other amendments which do not directly impact cities. This is <br />the companion to S.F. 472 which the Senate Tax Committee acted on last week. <br />Full House and Senate action is expected soon. <br />PROPERTY TAX STUDY COMMISSION <br />A subcommittee of the House Governmental Operations Committee considered <br />H.F. 388 which would establish a study commission to consider a site - valuation <br />system for property taxation. Site valuation would tax land values much higher <br />than buildings and other improvements. This type of property tax system would <br />dramatically increase taxes on vacant land while generally lowering them on <br />commercial and industrial property. The goal of this type of taxation system <br />is to encourage development of vacant land, encourage the building of large <br />structures rather than small structures on large parcels, and eliminate the <br />current system which penalizes through higher taxes any improvements or <br />additions to existing structures. <br />Ideas the subcommittee discussed included the need for special provisions <br />for agricultural land, the possibility of providing this as a local option, <br />establishing a demonstration project before considering full implementation, <br />and examining the impact on owners of small homes on large lots. Members <br />generally agreed that additional study is necessary before the state could <br />seriously consider implementing such a proposal. However, the committee seemed <br />receptive to the establishment of a study commission. If the full committee <br />recommends this, it is likely that the bill would he rereferred to the Taxes <br />Committee. <br />13 <br />