Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />Planning Commission <br />July 11, 1985 <br />Mane <br />Property <br />Division <br />(Cont.) <br />Mr. Mane pointed out that at that time he provided utility easements <br />and everything else the City requested. <br />Mr. Grittman stated that the City does not want to create property <br />that is landlocked. Mr. Mane stated that the City is concerned about <br />parks and open space and suggested that this would be a good use of <br />this property. <br />Mr. DeLonais stated that when Mr. Mane sells his property, he does <br />not know what the next person will want to do with it. <br />Mr. Herkenhoff stated that nothing can be done unless Mr. Mane and <br />Mr. Richie get together. At that time the property owners will <br />have to devise a plan to get to the back property. Herkenhoff <br />felt that this was between the property owners. <br />Mrs. Timmons stated that by doing one simple lot split at a time, <br />a property owner can avoid the ordinance. Mr. Mane stated that his <br />actions were not premeditated. <br />Mrs. Kingsbury recommended that the Mane property division be tabled <br />for further study and to allow Mr. Mane and Mr. Richie to get together <br />to devise a plan to ensure that the back property is not landlocked. <br />Mrs. Timmons did not think Mr. Richie had any intention of doing anything <br />with his property and did not feel that the City could force Richie to <br />come in. Mr. Ducharme informed the Commission that he knew Mr. Richie <br />had no intention of developing his property. <br />Mr. Herkenhoff pointed out that something could happen to Mr. Richie <br />tomorrow. Mr. Mane suggested that the City address the issue at that <br />point. Mane commented that he thought that the City could prefer to <br />have large lots, rather than small ones. <br />Mr. Ducharme stated that Mr. Richie bought a large piece of property <br />so that he would not have any near neighbors. <br />Mrs. Kingsbury withdrew her motion. <br />Mrs. Timmons felt that the Commission could act on the request. Timmons <br />pointed out that Mr. Richie is the larger landowner. <br />Mr. Herkenhoff recommended approval of the Mane property division subject <br />to the shed being removed and to utility easements being provided on lot <br />lines. <br />Motion seconded by Mr. Perlinger. <br />Motion carried 7 — 1. Mrs. Kingsbury was opposed. <br />Page —3— <br />