My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-26-06 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
04-26-06 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 1:31:58 PM
Creation date
4/22/2008 10:16:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUT);S <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />APRIL 26, 2006 <br />Blesener noted that the DNR provides a vehicle for exceeding the 30% <br />impervious standard. He again suggested amending the Code Co allow for <br />the horseshoe driveway provided that the installation is pervious surface as <br />well as additional mitigation is done. <br />The Planner again stated that his interpretation is that the Murphy's 44% <br />impewious surface is a legal non-conforming condition. The installation <br />of the horseshoe driveway with pervious surface will not increase the ^on- <br />conforming situation, therefore, is not subject to the variance procedure <br />and DNR review. <br />Allan stated that she would feel more comfortable if this driveway plan <br />was submitted to the DNR for review. The Planner stated that he is not <br />sure they would review it as a part of their normal permitting process. The <br />Planner suggested Chat the City could send the plan to the Watershed for <br />their advice. IC was also suggested that the City Engineer review Che plans <br />as well. <br />LaValle asked if the Murphy's could develop a plan that would not <br />increase run-off. Heidi Murphy reported that the City Engineer visited <br />their property and suggested a pervious paving material that would not <br />increase run-off. Murphy submitted an information sheeC on this materials <br />for the Council's review. Murphy reported that they are very excited <br />abouC this material, and indicated that they discussed it with their <br />neighbors as well who thought it would be a good option. <br />Allan indicated that it depends how pervious the material is and suggested <br />that it be reviewed with the City Engineer and the Watershed. <br />Murphy reported that in reviewing the Shoreland District provisions, she <br />wondered how the property division of her parcel got approved without a <br />review and analysis of the impervious surface issue. Blesener noted thaC <br />the Murphy property is grandfathered in at the 44% 'impervious surface. <br />Blesener suggested Yhat the best solution aC this poinC would be to allow <br />the Murphy's Co install a horseshoe driveway with a pervious surface that <br />will not increase run-off into the lake. Blesener suggested that the <br />Murphy's present a plan Co the City Engineer and Watershed for their <br />review and comment. <br />The City Planner suggested that the Murphy's have their designer put <br />together a plan for the horseshoe driveway utilizing a pervious surface. <br />The plan and information on the surfacing should be presented to the City <br />Engineer and Watershed for their comments. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.