My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-25-1985 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
09-25-1985 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2013 11:10:37 AM
Creation date
3/19/2013 11:07:45 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />Planning Commission <br />Sept. 12, 1985 <br />Carlson <br />Used Car <br />License <br />(Cont.) <br />Schrier/ <br />Mogren <br />Property <br />Division <br />Mr. Crittman stated that Mr. Carlson will comply with the provisions <br />of the new ordinance. <br />Carlson indicated that his feeling from the Council was that this was <br />fine in the industrial area. Carlson pointed out that nothing will be <br />change from the existing Framecraft facility other than the addition <br />of office space for himself. Carlson stated that he will comply with <br />the ordinance. <br />The Planner suggested that any approval be contingent upon receipt of <br />a site plan for the lot. <br />}lerkenhoff asked if there would be a limit as to the number of cars on <br />the premises. The Planner stated that this is why a site plan is <br />needed as it will show how may cars could be on the site. If the number <br />of cars is exceeded, the Building Inspector would be able to come in <br />and order the property cleaned up. <br />Mr. Herkenhoff recommended approval of the conditional use permit <br />requested by Steve Carlson for used car sales license subject to <br />receipt of a site plan. <br />Motion seconded by Mr. Perlinger. <br />Motion carried 5 - 0. <br />There was no one present on the Schrier /Mogren property division. The <br />Planner reported that he did not know anything about this matter. <br />Mrs. Kingsbury recommended that the Schri.er /Mogren property division <br />be tabled. <br />Motion seconded by Mr. Perlinger. <br />Motion carried 5 - 0. <br />Property Mr. French again expressed concern about the property located between the <br />Adjacent Cardinal property and Iona Lane. French commented that unless some plan <br />To Cardinal is made for this property, the people owning it will never be able to <br />Property develop it. <br />Mr. DeBace stated that in the past these people have wanted to be left <br />alone. However, from a planning standpoint, the property should be <br />looked at. <br />The Planner commented that one of the biggest problems is that the <br />people on Iona Lane have been assured that they will have an R -1 buffer <br />around their property. <br />Page -7- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.