Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />March 13, 1986 <br />Kath been done in this area. Timmons pointed out that the people on <br />Property the end of Morrison are concerned about drainage. <br />Division <br />(Cont.) Kath agreed that the neighbors are concerned about drainage, but <br />do not oppose this property division. <br />The Planner reported that the drainage problem in the Morrison area <br />is included in the Engineer's storm water drainage plan. <br />Timmons stated that she would feel more comfortable acting on this <br />proposal if she had an Engineer's report. Timmons pointed out that <br />the lots Mr. Kath would be creating are absolute minimum lots. <br />Davison stated that the Engineer would have considered the drainage <br />problem in the area when acting on Mr. Kath's fill permit, and the <br />effect the filling would have on local properties. <br />Timmons felt there should be more control and policing in the area <br />of fill permits. <br />Timmons pointed out that Kath originally requested four lots and now <br />is coming in for a fifth. Timmons questioned whether or not there <br />were two buildable lots. <br />Kath stated that filling the lots will not alter the drainage of the <br />area. <br />The Planner reported that the Engineer will look at the proposal. <br />Timmons questioned whether the lots size was consistent with the size <br />lots in the neighborhood. <br />Kath reported that the houses that would be built would have walk -out <br />basements. <br />The Planner reported that he has recommended approval of the property <br />division. The lots meet ordinance and the Engineer will review the <br />drainage. <br />Mr. Costa pointed out that one lot would have over 13,000 square feet <br />and the other over 12,000 square feet. <br />Mr. Davison commented that the Engineer has the drainage expertise <br />and this will be his responsibility. Davison did not feel there was <br />reason to hold the request up for a month pending a report from the <br />Engineer. <br />Mr. DeLonais recommended approval of the Frank Kath property <br />division as presented subject to adequate drainage and utility <br />easements being provided and subject to the recommendations of <br />the City Engineer and Attorney and Planner. <br />Motion seconded by.Mr. Perlinger. <br />Motion carried 5 - 1. Mrs. Timmons was opposed. <br />Pane -2- <br />