Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT #7 <br />Joel, <br />The City has the authority to vacate the improved and unimproved rights of way (Minn. Stat. § 412.851). When vacating <br />an easement the city acts in its legislative capacity. Therefore, its decision to vacate would only be set aside if a Court <br />determined that the city acted arbitrarily and capriciously against the best interest of the public. Kangas v. Blueberry <br />Township, 264 N.W.2d 389 (Minn. 1978); Rader v. Eastside Township, C3 -87 -744 (unpublished opinion). <br />The term "Public" encompasses a larger area than the immediate neighborhood. The City Council should be able to <br />conclude that its action is in the best interest of the city. <br />In this particular case, the developer will stub a dedicated street to accommodate the future development on adjacent <br />property. There is no guarantee that the City would not be sued by the adjacent neighborhood if it approves this <br />particular development but I am confident that the City would prevail in litigation. <br />If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Mr. Filla. <br />Shelli Akers <br />Legal Assistant to <br />Attorney Jerome P. Filla <br />Kelly & Lemmons, P.A. <br />Joel, <br />Generally, in regard to land use matters, the City Council makes either legislative or administrative decisions. A <br />legislative decision, as the name implies, is one that determines the scope and operation of City government. When a <br />city decides to construct a road or utility system, it is making a legislative decision. It is unlikely that in Court would <br />overturn a legislative decision of the city. <br />An administrative decision involves the application of laws that have been adopted by the city to development proposals <br />that are presented to the city. If the application is in compliance with the city's regulations, the council must approve <br />the application. If the application is not in compliance the city council must indicate why it is not in compliance and <br />deny the application. <br />The proposal submitted by Pine Tree Pond requires the City to make both a legislative and an administrative <br />decision. The legislative decision involves the vacation of the unimproved right of way. The City can determine where <br />to construct roads or other improvements within the City. This decision would probably not be overturned by a <br />reviewing Court. The application also involves administrative decision, i.e. does the application comply with the City <br />standards. If the application is compliant it should be approved. If it is not compliant the City should state its reason for <br />denying the request for plat approval. <br />If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Mr. Filla. <br />Shelli Akers <br />Legal Assistant to <br />Attorney Jerome P. Filla <br />Kelly & Lemmons, P.A. <br />30 <br />