My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-13-2013 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
03-13-2013 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2013 11:49:58 AM
Creation date
3/25/2013 11:49:50 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />MARCH 13, 2013 <br />share of costs will drop to 65% while Roseville's remains at 71%. That <br />would equate to a savings of $76,714 from projected 2013 SPRWS <br />charges and would fully negate the projected loss. The Administrator <br />noted that the SPRWS Board has not yet acted on the study, although the <br />General Manager indicated that it is likely they would apply the reduction <br />to all 2013 billed water usage. There are a few complicating factors such <br />as how SPRWS new "fixed fee" rate component impacts the study results, <br />did the City really get the appropriate credit for debt service payments, <br />and is SPRWS willing to address the past couple of years that Little <br />Canada has been paying for unrelated debt. <br />The Administrator indicated that he feels the City will be able to work <br />through these issues with SPRWS. Therefore, staff is recommending a <br />3% rate increase at this time. The 3% rate increase coupled with the <br />SPRWS 6.5% increase, results in a projected loss of $32,009. Given the <br />2012 projected profit, City staff believes the City is able to handle this <br />situation on a one year basis. <br />With regard to the Sewer Budget, the Administrator reported that the 2012 <br />Sewer Utility Fund budgeted a deficit of $50,270, with actual operating <br />results at a loss of $56,868. Projected revenues were off by $41,000, but <br />personnel costs were down by about $28,000. Coupled with higher <br />investing earnings and some other expense reductions, the City absorbed <br />most of the unrealized revenue. <br />The Administrator noted that with no rate increase in 2013, budgeted <br />operations are projected to result in a loss of $34,234. The primary reason <br />for the reduced loss is a reduction in treatment costs from Metropolitan <br />Council Environmental Services (MCES) for 2013. Another positive <br />factor is the City's projection that infiltration /inflow corrective work <br />started in 2012 and scheduled for completion in 2013 should result in <br />reduced flows. <br />The Administrator noted that coupled with the fact that depreciation <br />accounts for $130,000 of the City's expenditures, staff believes a sewer <br />rate increase can be avoided for 2013. <br />The Administrator recommended the following 2013 utility rates: <br />Sewer Minimum <br />Sewer Use Rate <br />Water Winter Rate <br />Water Summer Rate <br />Water Service Fee <br />3 <br />2012 2013 <br />$55.00 $55.00 <br />$3.58 $3.58 <br />$2.95 $3.04 <br />$3.05 $3.14 <br />$12.60 $12.60 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.