Laserfiche WebLink
MII!UTES <br />Planning Commission <br />August 14, 1986 <br />Text Mr. Schultz reported that he had a signed petition from all of <br />Amendment the neighbors against the conditional use permit allowing the <br />(Cont.) lawn maintenance companies in a D -3 zone. <br />Schultz felt that the building should be used by businesses that <br />will stay within the building. Schultz felt that the Commission <br />should consider what is best for the area and what is compatible <br />with the area. Schultz commented that it was a bad investment on <br />the part of Mr. Frattalone to have rebuilt this building after it <br />burned down. Schultz also pointed out that the property owners <br />on Park Street were not informed of this hearing. <br />Mrs. Schultz pointed out that Park Street is a new street and there <br />are still vacant lots on it and there will be additional homes <br />effected by this property in the future. <br />Herkenhoff asked if the proposal was acceptable to the property <br />owners in the area if the things that were objectionable were <br />taken care of. <br />DeLonais pointed out that Frattalone is proposing a 7 foot berm <br />with trees and shrubs. <br />Schultz felt that the proposal was the same as a rezoning as the <br />use would be better suited in an industrial area. <br />Timmons pointed out that with a conditional use permit the City <br />can place whatever conditions on the property it choses. <br />Schultz asked what good conditions would do when the City has not <br />been able to monitor the property for the last six or seven years. <br />Mr. Frattalone agreed that there were years when the property was <br />messy and he was not aware of it. However, he has cleaned up <br />the property and all the objectionable businesses will he <br />vacating the premises on September 1. <br />Frattalone stated that he would be agreeable to blacktopping all <br />the driving areas if the City wishes. <br />Timmons suggested that the matter be tabled for one month so <br />that the objectionable businesses can relocate and the area <br />can get cleaned up. <br />Frattalone stated that he will not do any paving on the property <br />until the City has made a decision on the text amendment. <br />tlr. Magneson stated that the condition of the property does not <br />bother him, it is the noise on Saturdays and Sundays that he <br />objects to. <br />Page -5- <br />