Laserfiche WebLink
Little Canada Planning Commission <br />4 September 1986 <br />'Page Two <br />• Roof signs erected prior to the current ordinance may be considered con- <br />forming if they meet the following conditions: <br />1. The Building Official finds the signs and sign structure to be in <br />good condition and they do not endanger the public health, safety, <br />or general welfare. <br />2. The roof sign (and any other signs) meet the performance standards of <br />the ordinance with regard to allowed sign area, as well as other <br />restrictions of the Sign Ordinance, Section 903.110. <br />3. For evaluation purposes, roof signs are to be evaluated against the area <br />and height requirements for freestanding signs. Height is to be <br />measured as specified In the Ordinance definitions. <br />A proposed ordinance is attached to this report. It is structured to allow review <br />by the Building Official when new sign applications affecting existing roof signs <br />are made. The ordinance is designed to grandfather only those signs which meet <br />other ordinance criteria. Existing roof signs which exceed sign area allowances, <br />for instance, would not be grandfathered in. With these restrictions, we recommend <br />approval of the text amendment. <br />cc: Joe Chlebeck ✓ <br />Tom Sweeney <br />Don Carley <br />John Palacio <br />David Johnson <br />