Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JANUARY 25, 2006 <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Keis. <br />Ayes (3). <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />Mr. Blesener introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO 2006-I-I6 -APPROVING THE FOLLOWING <br />LICENSES FOR THE LICENSE PERIOD JANUARY 26, 2006 <br />THROUGH JUNE 30, 2006: <br />0 3.2 INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR LICENSE FOR BRIAN <br />MEYER, COLISEUM BILLIARDS, 2900 RICE STREET, <br />SUBJECT TO RECEIPT OF SATISFACTORY LIQUOR <br />LIABILITY INSURANCE; <br />o AMUSEMENT DEVICE LICENSE FOR B & B MEYER LLC, <br />COLIEEUM BILLIARDS, 2900 RICE STREET <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Montour. <br />Ayes (3). <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />COUNTY The City Administrator reviewed his report dated January 25, 2006 <br />ROAD B relative to the three offers the City has received for its County Road B <br />LAND SALE property. The Administrator reported that he has discussed the City's <br />standard purchase agreement with all three potential purchasers who were <br />agreeable to utilizing the City's standard form and requirements. <br />The Administrator briefly reviewed the three offers. He noted that the <br />DaVern offer would involve the development of an assisted living facility. <br />The Administrator felt the property and area were more properly suited for <br />office/warehouse development. He also reported that he discussed with <br />DaVern the fact that the assisted living use would equate into a higher <br />land value. However, there has been no adjustment in the offer amount <br />from DaVern. The Administrator also noted that the assisted living use <br />would require a rezoning of the property. The Administrator felt that <br />while the assisted living use would be good to have in the City, this <br />particular property and surrounding area was not an ideal location. With <br />regard to the tax exempt issue, DaVern has indicated that they are afor- <br />profit corporation and would not be seeking tax-exempt status. The City <br />could put agreements in place to try to ensure that the property stays on <br />the tax rolls; however, the enforceability of an agreement of Chis nature is <br />a risk if the ownership of the property changes. <br />