My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-07-78 Planning Comm. Agenda
>
Agenda Packets
>
1971-1979
>
1978
>
09-07-78 Planning Comm. Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2013 11:22:18 AM
Creation date
4/8/2013 11:20:58 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC MEETING <br />LITTLE CANADA, MINNESOTA <br />August 2, 1978 <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a special meeting was held on the <br />2nd day of August, 1978 at Kellogg High School, Little Canada, Minnesota to <br />review and receive comments pertaining to the Little Canada Comprehensive <br />Plan. <br />City Council Members Present: Councilman <br />Councilman <br />Councilman <br />Planning Commission <br />Members Present: <br />Also Present: <br />City Clerk <br />Recording Secretary <br />Midwest Planning <br />& Research <br />Mr. Raymond Hanson <br />Mr. Robert De Bace <br />Mr. Morris Jespersen <br />Mrs. Virginia Fisher <br />Mr. Frank Winike <br />Mr. Earl Rossey <br />Mr. Gene DeLonais <br />Mr. Mike Fahey <br />Mr. Joe Vitale <br />Dr. Tom Keenan <br />Mr. Joseph Chlebeck <br />Mrs. Kathleen Glanzer <br />Mr. Brad Nielsen <br />Mr. Brad Nielsen, Midwest Planning & Research, presented the Little Canada <br />Comprehensive Plan explaining the process that Midwest Planning & Research <br />went through to develop the Plan and the Plan itself. Mr. Nielsen explained <br />what was proposed for each of the actual planning districts and answered questions and <br />comments on each of the districts. He then asked for general questions on the <br />proposed Plan. <br />The Planning Districts that were subject to discussion were Districts 9, 10, <br />14, 15, 21, 22, 23, and 24. <br />District 9 - Citizens were concerned with the minimum lot size requirements <br />that would be set in District 9. The planner has recommended <br />smaller lots, and citizens were concerned that this was not in <br />keeping with the rural type of community that they were after. <br />One citizen expressed his disapproval of townhouses in the area. <br />Citizens felt that by making District 9 a mid - density area with <br />more people in the area, the more services that would be needed. <br />This would cost homeowners more money. Mr. Nielsen stated that <br />by providing services to smaller lots, these services were sometimes <br />more economical than providing these services to larger lots. <br />One citizen asked if the number of smaller lots in this district <br />increased, would that cause the taxes on the larger lots to go up. <br />Mr. Nielsen stated that it could cause the taxes to go down. <br />023 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.