Laserfiche WebLink
District 10 - Midwest Planning Research recommended this rea <br />remain single family residential thnorthernarea <br />suggested as apartments as it borders on some apartments <br />in Vadnais Heights. <br />One citizen was concerned with the noise, traffic problems, and <br />polution that apartments would create in this area. <br />necessary that thus ortathewas <br />apartments proposed for the that <br />araa Mr.e <br />nielsenry ao support proposed in the <br />Nielsen stated that a commercial center was also p P <br />Plan for this half of the City. <br />Many citizens living adjacent to the area proposed beg zoned <br />for apartments ths area. stated r. Nielsen assured thagainst esidents that proper <br />into this ands• e screening of the apartments would, in <br />hisfview, and w the view, allow the apartments to fit into the area. However, <br />residents still expressed the fact that they did not want to see <br />apartments in this area. <br />One citizen brought up the fact that Maplewood proposed the <br />Beam Avenue extension and that Little Canada in the Comprehensive <br />Road D to be a minor arterial. How does <br />Litt calls <br />Canada dar Conti against Maplewood in their ability to have <br />Gutty Condda as a n <br />County Road D as a minor arterial over the Beam Aytsuviewseby on. <br />Mr. Nielsen felt that if Little Canada backed up <br />statistics, the Metropolitan Council would see it our way. <br />District 14 - There were no comments on District 14. <br />District 15 - One citizen questioned the Plants suggestion that the City buy <br />shoreline on Lake Gervais. Mr. Nielsen stated that this was just <br />a suggestion so that the entire community. could be given access <br />to the lake. It is just a consideration. <br />One citizen was concerned with the future of Edgerton as a minor <br />arterial with the public beach and proposed bike and community <br />trails. Is this possible? The street is very narrow. Mr. Nielsen <br />stated that if the road were improved, the things proposed for <br />Edgerton could be added. Councilman DeBace <br />Bstatedathat there are <br />plans to improve Edgerton from County <br />District 21 - One citizen asked if consideration was given to the watershed <br />of this area if more development goes in. Mr. Nielsen stated <br />that every proposed development is evaluated as far as drainage <br />situation. <br />District 22 - One citizen asked if under R-3 zoning if townhouses, duplexes <br />and four- plexes were allowed. replied that atlt unhorses <br />and duplexes <br />tiona s use permits. Nr. Nielsen also stated that City <br />conditional use p <br />controls would determine what went in. <br />District 23 - There were no comments on District 23. <br />District 24 - There were no comments on District 24. <br />Page -2- <br />