02-13-1980 Council Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

November 1, 1979 Regular Meeting Page Three itself, but he has no idea on the entire arca. Mgr. Newmark said this points up that we need a management plan for the area. Mr. Drake asked who would take responsibility for water damage. Mr. Marshall said so far this has been a private action on private property. After a permit has been granted or denied, then the agency could be brought into an action. The City gave him a permit to fill about a year ago. Pres. Lake said our options are in effect, to stay with our original decision to deny the permit and enjoin any development and subsequent development that could be with or without removing existing fill, or to reconsider the original permit as the developer originally proposed, with more or less filling and compensating excavating. Fir. Sprosty was told the County controls the level of the lakes. Pres. Lake asked if the slope could be gentler on lots 5 and 6. A strip about 100' wide has been excavated and worked on up to the creek. Mgr. Lyon said we should specify the minimum elevation they can build at so that future buyers could be warned. He asked Mr. Klein what effect a 4 - 1 slope would have on the area right now, and what the effect on storage and water quality would be if a permit were granted. Mr. Klein did not know what effect this would have upstream. We should now provide for upstream storage when the large developer we have heard about brings in his plat. Pres. Lake mooted we reconsider the denial Permit #138; an Motion further that we grant Permit #138 with the condi ions hat, "1) the minimum basement floor elevation be at the minimum elevation of 864.6'; 2) that the minimum side slopes on the county ditch be at the minimum 1 on 4; 3) that the back portions of lots 6, 7 and 8 be covered by a drainage and utility easement granted to the City of Little Canada; 4) that fill in lots 7 and 8 be extended for 100' to the west of the Keller Pkwy. easement. Mgr. Newmark seconded the motion. Mr. Klein said he would like an addition to the motion. Pres. Lake moved it be amended to include that fill on lot 7 may be extended southerly to the bank of the creek, with the side slope previously mentioned and material to be excavated from the bottom and side of the county ditch. Motion failed due to lack of a second. Mgr. Lake then moved it be amended to provide for southerly filling on lot 7 to the edge of the creek with the appropriate side slope, and with fill and material being obtained on site. Mgr. Lyon seconded the motion, and amendment passed, unanimously. There was a unanimous approval of the original motion, as amended. In the absence of the President and Vice President, the Secretary will sign the permit. With regard to the Clapp- Thompson development, Permit #27, Fr. Genzch was concerned with dcmolotion waste being used for fill and is a fairly sizeable one so the County gets involved in it. There are concerns about surface and ground water pollution. Mr. Genzch has not seen the original plans, but does not know what Clapp - Thompson intends to do about it. They are using asphalt, concrete, tires, etc. Our permit conditions were for clean fill. Our Attorney can write a letter to enjoin all future fill and related activities including building, until such time non -inert materials are removed, or to enjoin all future action and complete the filling with inert fill and seal 'off the non -inert materials, and then complete the project. Permit "27 ' Liu 9