04-22-1987 Council Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Little Canada /Sherman - Boosalis April 2, 1987 Page Six Phasing: As the developer has no firm plans for the north portion of the property, it is recommended that the P.U.D. be developed in phases. Phase I would include the bulk of the illustrated development as shown on Exhibit F. Phase II would be the area of the potential convenience restaurant, and Phase III would be the undeveloped portion of the project. An option would be to subdivide the undeveloped portion off from the Phase I and II areas and exclude it from the P.U.D. It could then develop independently in the future or could be added to the current development through a P.U.D. amendment. This would also have advantages by excluding it from the tax increment district, if one is approved. Signs: All signs for the development must be reviewed at staff level for conformance to the City Sign Ordinance. The sign plan should be submitted for review prior to the granting of building permits. RECOMMENDATION The proposed development provides opportunity for the City to see a longstanding blighted parcel improved with a high quality, commercial development. The development is viewed positively in concept, with some modification and addition. We recommend of the Conditional Use Permit for a concept stage Planned Unit development, a Subdivision (lot combination), and a Conditional Use Permit for a convenience gas /grocery subject to the following conditions: s Compliance with the C.U.P. conditions of Section 912.040.C. • Service and loading areas are provided in accordance with this report. Refuse container is provided. Circulation is revised to eliminate the northern most curb cut. Documentation of an access easement from Dr. Kreinke is provided. Grading and drainage plans are provided and approved. o Landscape, fence; and screening plans are provided and approved. Page 64