Laserfiche WebLink
Little Canada Planning Commission <br />1July 1987 <br />Page Two <br />As shown on Attachments A and B, the parcel the building is located on is landlocked. <br />The property does not have direct access onto a public street. Parcel A is owned <br />by the City as shown on Attachment C. St. John's must have written permission to <br />use this parcel for parking and access to the Credit Union or an alternative may be <br />to purchase a portion of adjacent land for access to the Credit Union. The applicant <br />must provide a parking plan, as well as parking lot layout for the City -owned parcel <br />that the Credit Union is intending to use. <br />Parking is another issue that must be addressed. Todate, a parking plan has not been <br />submitted. The ordinance outlines parking requirements in Section 903.050 and <br />requires adequate off - street parking to be provided for professional offices. St. <br />John's is required to provide three spaces plus one space for each 200 square feet <br />of floor area. In addition, two spaces are required per dwelling unit. Therefore, <br />St. John's is required to provide 13 spaces for the Credit Union and two spaces for <br />the residential dwelling, for a total of 15 parking spaces. A parking plan must be <br />submitted and approved prior to approval of the requested permits. <br />As noted previously, a CUP is required for off -site parking 'and must be approved <br />in conjunction with the two CUP's already requested. The property adjacent to <br />the Credit Union on the east is owned by St. Paul Water Department. A hockey <br />rink currently is on it. On the west is a small apartment building with three <br />apartments and on the south are residential homes. <br />As it appears the property is surrounded or landlocked with public street access <br />gained through use of the City parcel on the north. Therefore purchasing a por- <br />tion of land adjacent is unreasonable unless the entire lot was to be purchased. <br />VARIANCE <br />With the rezoning of the property, the existing structure is non - conforming to front <br />setback, side yard setback, lot width and lot area. Prior to the rezoning, the <br />building was non - conforming to front, area, and width requirements. The following <br />table shows the building requirements for both districts: <br />B -3 R -B Variance <br />Site Requirements Requirements Request <br />Area 8,200 s.f. 15,000 s.f. 15,000 s.f. 6,800 s.f. <br />Width 47 ft. 100 ft. 125 ft. 78 ft. <br />Front Setback 27 ft. 40 ft. 30 ft. 3 ft. <br />Side Setback 10 and 3 ft. None 15 ft. 5 and 12 ft. <br />As shown, the only way the building could expand is to accommodate the non - conforming <br />use and rezone from B -3 to R -B, although the performance requirements for both dis- <br />tricts are not met. <br />St. John's is requesting a variance from the area, width, front setback and side <br />setback requirements. The requested variance amounts are shown on the preceding <br />table. <br />Page 19 <br />