Laserfiche WebLink
Little Canada Planning Commission <br />6 October 1987 <br />Page Two <br />The Little Canada Zoning Ordinance sets up several criteria by which variance <br />requests are to be judged. They are: <br />a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, <br />structure, or building involved. <br />(1) Special conditions may include exceptional topographic or water <br />conditions or, in the case of an existing lot or parcel of record, <br />narrowness, shallowness, insufficient area or shape of the property. <br />(2) Special conditions and circumstances may not be primarily economic <br />in nature. <br />b. Literal interpretation of the provisions of this Ordinance would deprive <br />the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same <br />district under the terms of this Ordinance. <br />c. The special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions <br />of the applicant. <br />d. Granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special <br />privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands, structures, or <br />buildings in the same district. <br />e. A genuine hardship exists in complying with the literal terms of this <br />Ordinance. <br />In order to qualify for variance approval, an application must comply with all of the <br />stated conditions. The request fails to qualify as a special condition under point <br />a (1) and also would tend to confer a special privilege on the applicant. <br />In addition, granting the variance would be allowing the encroachment problem to be <br />overcome by encroaching on the setback from a totally unrelated property owner <br />(Lot 6). Secondly, while a house of certain design may not fit within the buildable <br />area remaining, a house of another design could still be constructed on the parcel. <br />As a result, we do not see a hardship present in this case. If there is a hardship, <br />it is economic in nature and is not within the scope of the Zoning Ordinance to resolve. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />We recommend that the variance for side yard setback be denied. The request does not <br />comply with Zoning Ordinance criteria for variance approval since any hardship is <br />economic in nature, and the variance would only allow an encroachment onto the setback <br />from an unrelated party. <br />cc: Joe Chlebeck John Palacio <br />Tom Sweeney Ron and Roxie Foyt <br />Don Carley Joel Hessen <br />Page 45 <br />