03-05-81 Planning Comm. Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Page 3 - Planning Commission Regular Meeting - February 5, 1981 W. JOHNSON PROPOSAL - Division of Lot D, RLS 64 and Vacation of Lake St. from Keller Pkwy to Lot 14 Manson Manner. Mr. Kepple, Attorney for Mr. Johnson appeared with proposal to divide the property into 5 lots and is now requesting that the city approve vacating Lake St. from the middle of the property So. to Keller Pkwy. Motion to recommended to the City Council that they hold a Public Hearing on the subject.of..vacating Lake St. made by Joe Vitale, seconded by Thomas Ducharme. Motion carried 7 -0 Brad Nielsen has not done a study on the subdividing of the property, but he feels that the lots are large enough and he sees no problem with the subdivision. Sharon Timmons asked if all five proposed lots would have lake rights and lake access to Keller Lake. Mr. Kepple stated that this issue has not been resolved completely yet. Mr. Kepple would like Sketch Plan approval at this time. Brad Nielsen stated that the matter of easements to the lake would be dealt with when the preliminary plans are presented to the city.. Sharon Timmons stated that she would be opposed to five families having access to the lake and being able to construct five docks, etc., on the property which is on'Gervais Lake. Motion to recommend that the City Council grant Sketch Plan approval made by Joe Vitale. Seconded by Thomas Ducharme. Motion carried: 7 -0 R. &. S DEVELOPMENT .. Mr. Louis Rustad appeared with proposal to put up a pole building on property next to the property they now own at 38 W. Woodlynn. They have not bought the land yet, but would like an idea from the city as to whether or not they could build on it if they did buy it. They would lease out the building and access to the building would be through the property they all ready own. Brad Nielsen asked if R.& S Automotive would be opposed to combining the property with theirs so there would be access to a public - rightof -way. Mr. Rustad asked what problems they might encounter because there is no access to public sewer unto the property. Brad Nielsen said that he thinks it is the Councils opinion that there should be no more on site sewer systems. The engineer would have an opportunity to address the problems connected with the sewer system when he looks at the plans. The question was raised as to whether or not the plan that Mr. Rustad had was a legal sub division of the property. It was the Planners feeling that t was not a legal subdivision. Mr. Rustad was instructed that he should perhaps go back to the owner of the property and have the owner find out first if there was a legal subdivision of the property. Motion to table until more detailed information can be presented on the subject was made by Sharon Timmons. Seconded by Jim Steel. Motion carried 7 -0